Smoldon v Whitworth

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Judgment Date17 December 1996
Date17 December 1996

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Caldwell v Maguire
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 June 2001
    ...in the relative calm of the workshop. 20 The last, and the most important of the cases considered by Holland J, is Smoldon v Whitworth (1997) ELR 249. In that case the claimant sued another player and a referee at a rugby match in which he was badly injured when the scrum collapsed. The cla......
  • Vowles v Evans
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 March 2003
    ... ... 21 More in point is the decision of this court in Smoldon v Whitworth & Nolan [1997] PIQR p.133 ... In that case the plaintiff had been playing hooker, aged 17, in a colts game involving young players under ... ...
  • Dani Laura Chelsea Czernuszka (Nee Watts) v Natasha Mercedes King
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 23 February 2023
    ... ... 40 In the course of his judgment at first instance, Holland J referred to the case of Smoldon v Whitworth (1997) ELR 249 ... In that case the claimant sued another player and a referee at a rugby match in which he was badly injured when the ... ...
  • Vowles v Evans
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 13 December 2002
    ... ... decision that an amateur rugby referee owed a duty of care to players in an adult game of rugby. Smolden v. Whitworth [22002] PIQR 137 was distinguishable because there the existence of a duty of care in a colts game was conceded. He referred me to the threefold ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • A Different Ball Game—Why the Nature of Consent in Contact Sports Undermines a Unitary Approach
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 71-6, December 2007
    • 1 December 2007
    ...risks which are inherent in that sport . . . but this does noteliminate all duty of care of the one participant to the other’.147 [1997] ELR 249.148 Smoldon v Whitworth and Nolan [1997] ELR 249.149 [2003] EWCA Civ 318.150 McCord v Swansea City AFC Ltd, The Times (11 February 1997), per Ian ......
  • Winner All Right? Liability in Tort For Injury in Sport
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review No. VI-2003, January 2003
    • 1 January 2003
    ..."The threshold of liability is a high one. It will not be easily crossed". (Citing Bingham L.C.J. as he then was in Snioldon v. Whitworth [1997] ELR 249, where a rugby player who suffered injury when a scrum collapsed failed in his action against an opposing player). Bingham L.C.J. rejected......
  • Consent and the Rules of the Game: The Interplay of Civil and Criminal Liability for Sporting Injuries
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 69-5, October 2005
    • 1 October 2005
    ...Fitzgerald [2001] EWCA Civ 1054,[2002] PIQR 6. 22 Blake v Galloway [2004] EWCA Civ 814, [2004] 1 WLR 2844 at [13–15].23 Ibid. at [16].24 [1997] PIQR 133. 418 Consent and the Rules of the the same position, he cannot possibly be said to have consented to a breachof duty on the part of the of......
  • Swallows and Amazons, or the Sporting Exception To the Gender Recognition Act
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Social & Legal Studies No. 17-1, March 2008
    • 1 March 2008
    ...(1977) 400 NYS 2d 267San Francisco Arts and Athletics v United States Olympic Committee (1987) 483 US 522Smoldon v Whitworth and Nolan [1997] PIQR 133Watson v British Boxing Board of Control [2001] QB 1134 REFERENCES Anderson, Jack (2006) ‘An Accident of History: Why the Decisions of Sports......