Smurthwaite v Hannay

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date11 August 1893
Date11 August 1893

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Official Receiver v Singh and Others
    • Guyana
    • Supreme Court (British Guiana)
    • Invalid date
  • Seow and Others v Taylor and Others
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Supreme Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • Invalid date
  • Ryan Morris and 131 Others v Williams & Company Solicitors (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 April 2024
    ...history of group claims going back to the seminal decisions of the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords in Hannay & Co v. Smurthwaite [1893] 2 QB 412 ( Hannay CA), and [1894] AC 494 ( Hannay HL). The Claimants argue that, if the Solicitors succeed, the Claimants will be forced to give up ......
  • Sandeman & Sons v Tyzack and Branfoot Steamship Company
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 18 July 1913
    ...Company(18 L. T. Rep. 632; L. Rep. 3 C. P. 427) distinguished. Dictum of Lord Russell of Killowen in Smurthwaite v. Hannay (7 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 380, 485; 71 L. T. Rep. 157, 160; (1894) A. C. 494, 505) considered. Decision of the Second Division of the Court of Session (1913, S. C. 19) reve......
  • Get Started for Free