Stacey v Hill
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1900 |
| Date | 1900 |
| Year | 1901 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd
...an early stage of the hearing I formed the view that Hill v. East and West India Dock Co. (1884) 9 App. Cas. 448, and Stacey v. Hill [1901] 1 Q.B. 660, could not well stand together, despite Sir Robert Megarry V.-C.'s attempt to reconcile the decisions in Warnford Investments Ltd. v. Duckwo......
-
Rvb Investments Ltd v Alastair Roderick Bibby
...in the lease. He cannot have possession of the property and, at the same time, claim rent for the property from others. 16 Stacey v Hill [1901] 1 KB 660 was a case where the tenant went bankrupt and his trustee in bankruptcy disclaimed the lease. The Landlord did not resume possession. The......
-
Tempany v Royal Liver Trustees Ltd, Re Farm Machinery Distributors Ltd
... ... Group Limited. This was the view taken by the Court of Appeal in England in Stacey .v. Hill ( (1901) 1K.B. 660 ) a decision to which it will be necessary to return; and it is based on the proposition that the liabilities of a ... ...
-
Allied Dunbar Assurance Plc v Fowle and Others
... ... His Lordship reviewed the authorities and concluded that he was bound by the Court of Appeal decision in Stacey v HillELR ((1901) 1 KB 660) to hold that the lease had determined from the date of the disclaimer so that the surety's liability for future arrears ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results