Sneddon v Stevenson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Date1967
Year1967

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • R v Sang
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 13 December 1978
    ...and the apprehension of criminals. 39 This reasoning was later accepted by Lord Parker himself in the Divisional Court in Sneddon v. Stevenson (1967) 1 W.L.R. 1051, another clear case of incitement, as had been both Brannan v. Peek and Murphy. The appellant was a prostitute. She had been co......
  • Henfield et Al v Commissioner of Police
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 26 September 1996
    ...President, Kenneth M. George and Nicholas J. O. Liverpool, Justices of Appeal. 49 In the judgment, to which all concurred, Sneddon v. Stevenson was referred to, with particular reference to Walter, J.'s ruling. 50 Walter, J. stated in Sneddon v. Stevenson [1967] 2 All E.R. 1277 at page 1281......
  • Maycock et Al v Commissioner of Police
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 28 April 1995
    ...The rule as to corroboration of accomplices does not apply to agents provocateur (vide R v. Bickley (1902) 2 Cr App Rep 53 and Sneddon v. Stevenson [1967] Crim LR 476). The fact that Brown and Perry as agents provocateurs may have been authorised to possess cocaine does not however affect t......
  • Henfield et Al v Commissioner of Police
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • 26 September 1998
    ...President Kenneth M. George and Nicholas J. O. Liverpool, Justices of Appeal. 53 In the judgment, to which all concurred, Sneddon v. Stevenson was referred to, with particular reference to Waller, J.'s ruling. 54 Waller stated in Sneddon v. Stevenson [1967] 2 All E.R. 1277 at page 1281 that......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Courts of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 43-4, October 1979
    • 1 October 1979
    ...words to thiseffectofLord MacDermott CJinthecaseofR. v.Murphy (1965, N I 138 at p.147),and alsonotedthatin Sneddon v.Stevenson (1967, 1 W L R 1051) Lord Parker CJsaid atp.1057:"Nodoubtactionofthis sort should not be employed unless it is192 genuinely thought by those in authority that it is......