South Bucks District Council v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLORD STEYN,LORD SCOTT OF FOSCOTE,LORD RODGER OF EARLSFERRY,LORD CARSWELL,LORD BROWN OF EATON-UNDER-HEYWOOD
Judgment Date01 July 2004
Neutral Citation[2004] UKHL 33
CourtHouse of Lords
Date01 July 2004
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
979 cases
  • Sarah Williams (A Representative Claimant for "e17 Streets4all") v London Borough of Waltham Forest
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 6 November 2015
    ...resolves issues raised by an objector on the merits of an order (referring to South Buckinghamshire District Council v Porter (No 2) [2004] 1 WLR 1953 at paragraph 33). 91 Although the matter has not been argued, I would doubt whether the legal requirements of a duty to give reasons when de......
  • [1] Siobahn Nicola Gillespie [2] Citco BVI Ltd Claimants v The Minister of Natural Resources and Labour Defendant
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 19 April 2013
    ...for the Home Department [2006] EWHC 2416 (Admin) 6 R v Gaming Board ex parte Benaim and Khaaida at pages 430 - 431 7 [1994] 1 AC 531 8 [2004] 1 WLR 1953, HL, para 36 per Lord Brown 8 R (Nash) v Chelsea College of Art and Design [2001] EWHC 538 (Admin) 10 (1990) 3 Admin LR 189 11 Alexander......
  • Niall Carroll v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 12 October 2016
    ... ... planning permission for development at 19, South End, London W8 5BU ("the property") ... 2 ... to remain in Class B1 as offices, the Council, supported by the Rule 6 party, maintains that ... Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions [2001] EWHC Admin 74 , at [6]: ... P & CR 26 , at 28; and South Somerset District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment ... set out by Lord Brown in South Bucks District Council and another v. Porter (No 2) ... ...
  • Meera Muhiadeen Haleemudeen v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 May 2014
    ...not be elaborate, and need not deal with every argument presented. The much cited statement of the duty in South Bucks DC v Porter (No 2) [2004] UKHL 33 reported at [2004] 1 WLR 1933 at [36], albeit in the context of reasons for planning decisions rather than by tribunals, is to the same ef......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
  • Note On Appeals To The Planning Inspectorate Against The Revocation Of A Permit By The Environment Agency- Random Jottings From The Silk Coal Face
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 7 October 2015
    ...(HEARING PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND) RULES 2000 BUSHELL V SEC. OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT 1981 AC 75 SOUTH BUCKINGHAMSHIRE DC V PORTER (NO 2) 2004 UKHL 33 2004 1 WLR 1953 E V SEC. OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT 2004 EWCA CIV 49 2004 QB 1044 SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DC V SEC. OF STATE FOR COMMUNITI......
  • Challenging a public body’s decision for lack of any or adequate reasons
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 20 December 2017
    ...of State for the Environment (1993) 66 P & CR 263. 2 As per Lord Brown in South Buckinghamshire District Council v Porter (No 2) [2004] 1 WLR 1953; and Westminster City Council v Great Portland Estates plc [1985] AC Maeve Hanna function JDS_LoadEvent(func) { var existingOnLoad = window.onlo......
  • Recent Judgment Of The Cayman Islands Court Of Appeal Concerning Validation Orders
    • Cayman Islands
    • Mondaq Cayman Islands
    • 24 May 2018
    ...27 April 2018) (CICA 1 of 2017) [2004-05] CILR 533 [2006] CILR 80 [2002] 1WLR 2409 [2013] EWCA Civ 587 [2014] UKSC 41 John Wardell, QC [2004] UKHL 33; [2004] 1WLR 1953 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sough......
  • Expert Determination: Can The Courts Intervene?
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 22 March 2007
    ...in a prior directions hearing. These were "principal important controversial issues" (as per Lord Brown in South Bucks DC v Porter [2004] UKHL 33 at para 36) and it was for the umpire to explain his conclusions on such The umpire failed to indicate the extent to which he had checked the rel......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 books & journal articles
  • Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...exercise, but was one which needed to have a ‘special regard’ or ‘special attention’ to the heritage assets 34 [1991] 1 WLR 153. 35 [2004] 1 WLR 1953. 36 [2017] EWCA Civ 427. 37 See also NPPF, paras 131–135. 38 [2015] JPL 454. 426 Planning Law: A Practitioner’s Handbook ([120]). Historic En......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...UKHL 26, [2003] 2 AC 558, [2003] 2 WLR 1547, [2003] 3 All ER 1 150, 304, 305 South Buckinghamshire District Council v Porter (No 2) [2004] UKHL 33, [2004] 1 WLR 1953, [2004] 4 All ER 775, [2004] 4 PLR 50 150, 159, 199, 270, 285, 425 South Eastern Railway Co v Cooper [1924] 1 Ch 211, CA 531 ......
  • Planning Permission
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...for the stationing of caravans on three adjacent plots in the Green Belt. See also South Bucks District Council v Porter (No 2) [2004] UKHL 33, [2004] 1 WLR 1953 and New Forest District Council v Owen [2013] EWHC 265 (QB). Generally, an applicant’s personal circumstances will not carry much......
  • Planning Permission
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part VI. Elements of planning law
    • 30 August 2016
    ...for the stationing of caravans on three adjacent plots in the green belt. See also South Bucks District Council v Porter (No 2) [2004] UKHL 33, [2004] 1 WLR 1953 and New Forest District Council v Owen [2013] EWHC 265 (QB). Generally, an applicant’s personal circumstances will not carry much......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT