Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date1939
Year1939
Date1939

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
315 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • IFI Update, June 2009 - Part 1
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 14 July 2009
    ...14PD 64, at 68). Similarly, the test that the proposed implied term "goes without saying" (see Shirlaw v. Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB 206, at 227) is simply another of emphasising the objective nature of the inquiry that should be undertaken. It shows that the proposed implica......
3 books & journal articles
  • General Principles of Interpretation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Interpretation of Agreements
    • 4 August 2020
    ...3 Alta LR (2d) 41 (SCTD). 190 Chinook Aggregates Ltd v Abbotsford (District), [1990] 1 WLR 624 (BCCA) [C hi-nook Aggregates ]. 191 [1939] 2 KB 206 (CA). 192 Ibid at 227. General Principles of Interpretation 839 off‌icious bystander test, it may be noted, is quite consistent with the presume......
  • The Legal Status and Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 12-2013, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...Division) as cited by Boulle and Nesic, supra note 15, p.509 42 The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64; Shirlaw v Southern Foundaries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB 206; Morton v Morton [1942] 1 All ER 273; and Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1977] AC 239 as cited by Boulle and Nesic, supra note 15, at p.509......
  • Implied Terms in Undisclosed Agency
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 84-3, May 2021
    • 1 May 2021
    ...(1889) 14 PD 64, 68; Reigate vUnion Manufacturing Co(Ramsbottom) Ltd [1918] 1 KB 592, 605; Shirlaw vSouthern Foundries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB206, 227.24 ibid at [26],[76]. In TrumpInternational Golf Club Scotland Ltd vScottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 74,[2016] 1 WLR 85 at [42]-[44],Lord Mance......