Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1939 |
| Date | 1939 |
| Year | 1939 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
403 cases
2 firm's commentaries
-
Contractual interpretation disputes from the Trustee's perspective: The saga continues
...expressed is something so obvious that it goes without saying (with reference to MacKinnon U in Shirlaw v Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB 206, 227). On the subject of implied terms, it has also been rightly noted that a term should not be implied into a detailed commercial contrac......
-
IFI Update, June 2009 - Part 1
...14PD 64, at 68). Similarly, the test that the proposed implied term "goes without saying" (see Shirlaw v. Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB 206, at 227) is simply another of emphasising the objective nature of the inquiry that should be undertaken. It shows that the proposed implica......
14 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...TLR 895, HL 8.7, 8.19 Sharma v Virgin Atlantic Airways 31 Avi 17, 539 (CD Cal, 2006) 10.49 Shirlaw v Southern Foundries (1926) Limited [1939] 2 KB 206, [1939] 2 All ER 113, 108 LJKB 747, 160 LT 353 6.149 Sidhu v British Airways plc [1997] 1 AC 430, [1997] 2 WLR 26, [1997] 1 All ER 193, 1997......
-
Non-regulated Contracts
...law in respect of certain types of contract. 105 103 Whether or not it is a regulated package. 104 Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Limited [1939] 2 KB 206 and see, also, Wall v Silver Wing Surface Arrangements , 18 November 1981, QBD, Hodgson J (unreported). 105 Implication by statute or statu......
-
General Principles of Interpretation
...3 Alta LR (2d) 41 (SCTD). 190 Chinook Aggregates Ltd v Abbotsford (District), [1990] 1 WLR 624 (BCCA) [C hi-nook Aggregates ]. 191 [1939] 2 KB 206 (CA). 192 Ibid at 227. General Principles of Interpretation 839 officious bystander test, it may be noted, is quite consistent with the presume......
-
General Principles of Interpretation
...Products Ltd. v. Luscar Limited (1982), 27 Sask. R. 299 (Q.B.). 144 Banks v. Biensch (1977), 3 Alta. L.R. (2d) 41 (S.C.T.D.). 145 [1939] 2 K.B. 206. 146 Ibid. at 227. 147 Above note 126. 148 (1889), L.R. 14 P.D. 64. 149 Ibid. at 68. 150 See, for example, Reigate v. Union Manufacturing Co. ,......
Request a trial to view additional results