Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1939 |
| Date | 1939 |
| Year | 1939 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
382 cases
1 firm's commentaries
-
IFI Update, June 2009 - Part 1
...14PD 64, at 68). Similarly, the test that the proposed implied term "goes without saying" (see Shirlaw v. Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB 206, at 227) is simply another of emphasising the objective nature of the inquiry that should be undertaken. It shows that the proposed implica......
15 books & journal articles
-
Non-regulated Contracts
...law in respect of certain types of contract. 105 103 Whether or not it is a regulated package. 104 Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Limited [1939] 2 KB 206 and see, also, Wall v Silver Wing Surface Arrangements , 18 November 1981, QBD, Hodgson J (unreported). 105 Implication by statute or statu......
-
Table of Cases
...TLR 895, HL 8.7, 8.19 Sharma v Virgin Atlantic Airways 31 Avi 17, 539 (CD Cal, 2006) 10.49 Shirlaw v Southern Foundries (1926) Limited [1939] 2 KB 206, [1939] 2 All ER 113, 108 LJKB 747, 160 LT 353 6.149 Sidhu v British Airways plc [1997] 1 AC 430, [1997] 2 WLR 26, [1997] 1 All ER 193, 1997......
-
General Principles of Interpretation
...3 Alta LR (2d) 41 (SCTD). 190 Chinook Aggregates Ltd v Abbotsford (District), [1990] 1 WLR 624 (BCCA) [C hi-nook Aggregates ]. 191 [1939] 2 KB 206 (CA). 192 Ibid at 227. General Principles of Interpretation 839 officious bystander test, it may be noted, is quite consistent with the presume......
-
General Principles of Interpretation
...Products Ltd. v. Luscar Limited (1982), 27 Sask. R. 299 (Q.B.). 144 Banks v. Biensch (1977), 3 Alta. L.R. (2d) 41 (S.C.T.D.). 145 [1939] 2 K.B. 206. 146 Ibid. at 227. 147 Above note 126. 148 (1889), L.R. 14 P.D. 64. 149 Ibid. at 68. 150 See, for example, Reigate v. Union Manufacturing Co. ,......
Get Started for Free