Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1939
Date1939
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
388 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Contractual interpretation disputes from the Trustee's perspective: The saga continues
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 23 June 2016
    ...expressed is something so obvious that it goes without saying (with reference to MacKinnon U in Shirlaw v Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB 206, 227). On the subject of implied terms, it has also been rightly noted that a term should not be implied into a detailed commercial contrac......
  • IFI Update, June 2009 - Part 1
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 14 July 2009
    ...14PD 64, at 68). Similarly, the test that the proposed implied term "goes without saying" (see Shirlaw v. Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB 206, at 227) is simply another of emphasising the objective nature of the inquiry that should be undertaken. It shows that the proposed implica......
13 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Saggerson on Travel Law and Litigation - 7th Edition Contents
    • 30 August 2022
    ...TLR 895, HL 8.7, 8.19 Sharma v Virgin Atlantic Airways 31 Avi 17, 539 (CD Cal, 2006) 10.49 Shirlaw v Southern Foundries (1926) Limited [1939] 2 KB 206, [1939] 2 All ER 113, 108 LJKB 747, 160 LT 353 6.149 Sidhu v British Airways plc [1997] 1 AC 430, [1997] 2 WLR 26, [1997] 1 All ER 193, 1997......
  • General Principles of Interpretation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Interpretation of Agreements
    • 4 August 2020
    ...3 Alta LR (2d) 41 (SCTD). 190 Chinook Aggregates Ltd v Abbotsford (District), [1990] 1 WLR 624 (BCCA) [C hi-nook Aggregates ]. 191 [1939] 2 KB 206 (CA). 192 Ibid at 227. General Principles of Interpretation 839 off‌icious bystander test, it may be noted, is quite consistent with the presume......
  • Non-regulated Contracts
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Saggerson on Travel Law and Litigation - 7th Edition Contents
    • 30 August 2022
    ...law in respect of certain types of contract. 105 103 Whether or not it is a regulated package. 104 Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Limited [1939] 2 KB 206 and see, also, Wall v Silver Wing Surface Arrangements , 18 November 1981, QBD, Hodgson J (unreported). 105 Implication by statute or statu......
  • The Legal Status and Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 12-2013, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...Division) as cited by Boulle and Nesic, supra note 15, p.509 42 The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64; Shirlaw v Southern Foundaries (1926) Ltd [1939] 2 KB 206; Morton v Morton [1942] 1 All ER 273; and Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1977] AC 239 as cited by Boulle and Nesic, supra note 15, at p.509......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT