Southwell v Bowditch
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1875 |
| Year | 1875 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
- Chen Teng Song and Others; Rashid Hussain Securities Sdn Bhd
-
Universal Steam Navigation Company v McKelvie & Company
...L.R. 5 Exch. 173). Whether all those decisions can stand with the later decisions of the Court of Appeal in ( Southwell v. Bowditch 1876, L.R. 1, C.P.D. 374) and ( Gadd v. Houghton 1876, L.R. 1 Exch. D. 357) it is not necessary for present purposes to determine; for in none of them was the ......
-
Vlassopulos (N. & J.) Ltd v Ney Shipping Ltd (Santa Carina)
...whether the agent is to be treated as a party to the contract". There follows a quotation from the judgment of Sir George Jessel in Southwell v. Bowditch, which I will not read. "This principle" - says the writer - "is ofgeneral application and is not to be confined to factors and brokers. ......
-
Schoultz v Voorsitter, Personeel-Advieskomitee van die Munisipale Raad van George, en 'n Ander
...maak geen saak nie, want daar is geen verskil, wat uitleg betref, tussen kontrakte en ander instrumente nie (Southwell v Bow-D ditch [1826] 1 CPD 374 (CA) op 376); en "If one construction makes the contract lawful and the other unlawful, the former is to be preferred. Thus, a bond condition......
Request a trial to view additional results