Spedding v Fitzpatrick

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1887
Date1887
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
44 cases
  • Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib bin Tun Hj Abdul Razak lwn Tony Pua Kiam Wee dan satu lagi
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • January 1, 2017
  • Quinn Insurance Ltd and Others v Tribune Newspapers Plc and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • May 13, 2009
    ...meet at the trial, and so to save unnecessary expense, and avoid allowing parties to be taken by surprise': Spedding v. Fitzpatrick [1888] 38 Ch. Div. 410 at p. 413, thus, were the pleading in question so general or so imprecise that the other side cannot know what case he will have to meet......
  • ABU HANIFAH BIN AB MAJID vs MAZMAN BIN ABD RAHMAH
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • February 21, 2021
    ...certainly be unfair to the defendants. There was an element of surprise that cannot be overlooked by this court (SPEDDING V FITZPATRICK (1888) 38 Ch D 410 at p 413; and THOMSON V BIRKLEY (1882) 31 WR [31] In FARRELL V. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE [1980] 1 WLR 172; [1980] 1 ALL ER 166 whe......
  • Alpha Aviation Ltd v Randy Larry Butler
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • July 20, 2021
    ...so that his opponent is not taken by surprise and knows exactly the case he has to meet at trial (see, e.g., Spedding v. Fitzpatrick (1888) 38 Ch. D. 410, CA; Bruce v Odhams Press Ltd. ( supra). But it does not require him to overload his statement with exhaustive particulars or minor detai......
  • Get Started for Free