Sport exceptionalism and the Court of Arbitration for Sport

Pages5-17
Published date12 March 2018
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-01-2018-0002
Date12 March 2018
AuthorHelen Lenskyj
Subject MatterHealth & social care,Criminology & forensic psychology
Sport exceptionalism and the Court of
Arbitration for Sport
Helen Lenskyj
Abstract
Purpose The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), created by the International Olympic Committee (IOC)
in 1983, resolves disputes between athletes and national or international sports governing bodies.
The purpose of this paper is to critically examine the history and functions of CAS, with a particular focus
on the ways in which athletesrights are threatened by the IOCs Code of Sports-Related Arbitration.
Design/methodology/approach The author reviews relevant law literature and media sources.
Findings The concept of lex sportiva (global sport law), general arbitration practices and controversies
concerning CASs impartiality are investigated, and the strict liabilityprinciple that CAS applies to doping
allegations is assessed. This analysis points to a long record of inconsistencies and contradictions in the
history and function of CAS. The findings lead to questions of arbitration or litigation; confidential or public
proceedings; specialist or generalist arbitrators; lex sportiva or international legal principles; precedential or
non-precedential awards; and civil or criminal burden of proof.
Originality/value These unresolved issues demonstrate how the IOC struggles to maintain supremacy
over world sport by promoting sport exceptionalism, and provide possible grounds for athletesfuture
challenges to CAS.
Keywords Athletesrights, Code of Sports-Related Arbitration, Court of Arbitration for Sport,
International Olympic Committee, Sport exceptionalism, Sports governing bodies, World sport
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
In 1983, after consultation with selected stakeholders, the International Olympic Committee (IOC)
established Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) because of the perceived need withinOlympic and
international sport circles for a confidential dispute resolution process that produced expedient,
flexible, inexpensive and informed judgmentsoutside of the court system (Kane, 2003, p. 2).
There islittle evidence thatsport-related caseswere causing an undueburden on the courtsbefore
CAS began operation, and it took about 20 years until the annual number of CAS cases finally
reached 100 (Duval and Marino, 2014). However, there has been no shortage of assertions from
sports governing bodies and sport lawyers that sport disputes should be resolved in a sport court.
The IOC, International Federations (IFs), National Olympic Committees (NOCs) and National
Sports Organizations (NSOs) that is, the most important Olympic industry players sought to
avoid what they saw as the evils of litigation, pointing to the time and costs involved, and
mainstream judgeslack of specialized knowledge of sport-related matters. In the words of one
veteran CAS Arbitrator, Michael Beloff, Render unto sports the things that are sportsand to
courts the things that are legal(Beloff, 2012, p. 80).
The pseudo-religious mystique surrounding all things Olympic, carefully nurtured for over a
century, provides fertile ground for promoting sport exceptionalism. Sport is special,according
to this line of thinking, and should not be tainted by local, national or international politics
(Lenskyj, 2000). The strong human rights movements of the last six decades in western
countries, focusing on equality and social justice for women, ethnic and sexual minorities, have
posed only a minor threat to Olympic industry hegemony.
Helen Lenskyj is a Professor
Emerita at the University of
Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
DOI 10.1108/JCRPP-01-2018-0002 VOL. 4 NO. 1 2018, pp.5-17, © Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 2056-3841
j
JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGICAL RESEARCH, POLICY AND PRACTICE
j
PAGE 5

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT