Sportswear SpA v Four Marketing Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Lloyd,Lord Justice Longmore,Lord Justice Waller
Judgment Date11 April 2006
Neutral Citation[2006] EWCA Civ 380
Docket NumberCase No: A3 2005/2316
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Date11 April 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • The Football Association Premier League Ltd v Anthony William Luxton
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 November 2016
    ...32 In developing his submissions, Mr Howe placed some reliance on the decision of this court in Sportswear SpA v Stonestyle Ltd. [2006] EWCA Civ 380; [2007] FSR 2. In that case the trade mark owners included codes on their garment labels which identified the distributors to which its garm......
  • European Property Fund Plc and Another v Ulster Bank Ireland Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 2 July 2015
    ...4 I.R. 417. At para. 78et seq., the learned trial judge cited with approval the judgment in Peekay Intermark v. ANZ Banking Group [2006] EWCA Civ 380 of Moore-Bick L.J. at para. 57:- ‘…“It is common to include in certain kinds of contracts an express acknowledgement by each of the parties t......
  • National Asset Loan Management DAC Ltd v Breslin
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 26 October 2017
    ...with clause 22.6 aforementioned. 43 The principle set out by Moore Bick L.J in Peekay Intermark v. ANZ Banking Group [2006] EWCA Civ. 380 at paragraph 57 provides as follows:- '... It is common to include in certain kinds of contracts an express acknowledgement by each of the parties that ......
  • Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd v Bolton Pharmaceutical Co 100 Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 May 2006
    ...reality. The relevant law is still in the process of formulation and, rather as this Court has held in Sportswear SpA v Stonestyle Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 380, summary disposition is not appropriate in what is a developing area of Mr Justice Lewison 93 I also agree. ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT