Sprung v Royal Insurance (UK) Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Judge | Beldam,Evans,Pill L JJ |
| Judgment Date | 14 June 1996 |
| Date | 14 June 1996 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
27 cases
-
Seele Austria GmbH & Company v Tokio Marine Europe Insurance Ltd
... ... OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL ... Adrian Williamson QC & Marcos ... In Travelers Casualty & Surety Co of Canada v Sun Life Assurance Co of Canada (UK) [2006] EWHC 2716 (Comm) there was a policy with a $ 25 million deductible and a dispute as to ... 1 , 35; see also The 'Italia Express' (No 2) [1992] 2 Lloyd's Rep 281 ; Sprung v Royal Insurance Co (UK) Ltd [1997] CLC 70 ... The right arises on the occurrence of the damage ... ...
-
Zurich Insurance Plc UK Branch v International Energy Group Ltd
...but as a right in damages: see eg The Italia Express (No 2) [1992] 2 Lloyd's Rep 281, 286, Sprung v Royal Insurance (UK) Ltd [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep IR 111. Further, a right to claim proportionate contribution would not normally satisfy the test of legal set-off, although, on the agreed facts ......
-
The Cultural Foundation (doing business as American School of Dubai) v Beazley Furlonge Ltd (as managing agent for Syndicate AFB 2623/623 at Lloyd's)
...contract is classified not as a debt, but as a right in damages: see eg Ventouris v Mountain [1992] 2 Lloyd's Rep 281, 286, Sprung v Royal Insurance (UK) Ltd [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep IR 111. Further, a right to claim proportionate contribution would not normally satisfy the test of legal set-......
-
Starlight Shipping Company (Claimant/ First Respondent) v Allianz Marine and Aviation Versicherungs AG and Others (Defendants/Applicants) Overseas Marine Enterprises Inc. (Third Party/Respondent)
...that the proposed amendment was bound to fail as a matter of English law because of the decision of the Court of Appeal in Sprung v Royal Insurance (UK) Ltd [1999] Lloyd's Rep I.R. 111. The applications for specific disclosure and further information were adjourned to the trial, which was l......
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
Insurance Contract Law Reform - Proposed Amendments to the Duty of Good Faith
...(The Lips) [1988] AC 395 and followed reluctantly by the Court of Appeal in the key case of Sprung v Royal Insurance (UK) Limited [1997] CLC 70. The Law Commission considers that Sprung is out of line with the principles of ordinary contract law. The general position is that a defendant is ......
-
Insurance And Reinsurance 2016
...Court, a Bermuda court is likely to follow the principle enunciated by the English Court of Appeal in Sprung v Royal Assurance plc [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep IR 111, that a claim for non-payment of insurance is a claim for damages for breach of contract, and that a claim for damages for non-payme......
-
Brokers Duty When Placing Business Interruption Insurance
...Some writers have found the case of Arbory controversial since it appears to override the rule in Sprung v Royal Insurance (UK) Ltd [1997] CLC 70 (which held that an insured is not entitled to the recovery of damages for the non-payment or late payment of insurance monies). However, the jud......
