Sri John Watts Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1675 |
| Date | 01 January 1675 |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 797
IN THE COMMON PLEAS.
Sri John Watts Case
sir john watts. Admiralty. Certain goods of a subjects of the King of Spaina were forfeited upon the high sea, and after were brought here into England, and there sold to Sir John Watts : and the goods were attached in the hands of Sir John Watts by process out of the Admiralty, and there a libel was exhibited against the goods remaining in the hands of Sir John Watts, and Sir John Watts was not made party to the suit. And...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1 cases
-
Murphy v GM PB PC Ltd and GH
...APOLLON, THE 1824 9 WHEAT 362 STORY CONFLICT OF LAWS 2ED 26 MANN STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW (1973) 1–139 ALONSO V CORNERO 1611 HOB 212, 2 BROWNL 29 KING OF ITALY V MARQUIS COSIMO DE MEDICI TORNAQUINCI 1918 34 TLR 623 BROKAW V SEATRAIN (UK) LTD 1971 2 QB 476 ARAB BANK PLC V MERCANTILE HOL......
