St. Pierre v South American Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1936
Date1936
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
107 cases
  • Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd v Lorrain Esme Osman (1988) 1 MSCLC 90, 051;
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • January 1, 1987
  • MacShannon v Rockware Glass Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • January 26, 1978
    ...years before The Atlantic Star was accurately stated in the oft-cited passage from the judgement of Scott L.J. in St Pierre v. South American Stores (Gath & Chaves) Ltd. [1936] 1 K.B. 382 , at 398: "The true rule about a stay under section 41 , so far as relevant to this case, may I th......
  • Multi-Code Electronics Industries (M) Bhd v Toh Chun Toh Gordon
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • November 3, 2008
    ...of the process of the court in some other way: per Scott L.J. at p 398 in St Pierre v. South American Stores (Gath and Chaves) Ltd [1936] 1 K.B. 382. On the facts, the plaintiffs submitted that no risk of injustice or prejudice would be occasioned to any of the defendants if the action here......
  • Loke Yu; Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • January 1, 1998
  • Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Conflict of Laws
    • September 8, 2010
    ...406 Spini v. Spini (1994), 157 N.B.R. (2d) 1, [1994] N.B.J. No. 567 (Q.B.)............... 450 St. Pierre v. South American Stores Ltd., [1936] 1 K.B. 382 (C.A.) .................... 116 Stanton v. Gudbranson (1999), 45 R.F.L. (4th) 85, [1999] B.C.J. No. 896 (S.C.) ................................
  • Discretion in the exercise of jurisdiction in conflict cases in Nigeria
    • South Africa
    • Juta Journal of Comparative Law in Africa No. , April 2022
    • April 21, 2022
    ...then the issue of the appropriate or more convenient forum is one to be 46 St Pier re v South American Stores (Gath and Chaves) Ltd [1936] 1 KB 382 (CA). See Nwapi op cit note 35 at 66.47 The Atlantic Star [1974] AC 436.48 MacShannon v Roc kware Glass Ltd [1978] AC 795.49 The Adbidin Daver ......
  • Courts 2
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 6: Part II Courts 2
    • June 27, 2016
    ...to ordinary people of discerning mind, not necessarily intellectuals. In St. Pierre v. South American Stores (Gath & Chares) Ltd. (1936) 1 K.B. 382 at 398 CA, Scott, L.J. held that the continuance of the action in one of the Courts would work manifest injustice to the defendant who seeks a ......
  • Reconceptualising ‘Justiciability’: Crafting a Coherent Framework for Australia’s Unique Constitutional Context
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 50-3, September 2022
    • September 1, 2022
    ...High Court of Australia (Oxford University Press, 2001) .9. Thorpe (n 7) 692.10. St Pierre v South American Stores (Gath and Chaves) Ltd [1936] 1 KB 382, 398 (Scott LJ), cited in Oceanic Sun LineSpecial Shipping Company Co Inc v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197, 209 (Wilson and Toohey JJ), 233 (Brenn......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT