Stanislav Dzgoev v Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Gross,Mr Justice Garnham
Judgment Date06 April 2017
Neutral Citation[2017] EWHC 735 (Admin)
Docket NumberCase No: CO/3567/2016
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Date06 April 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
22 cases
  • The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Yagnesh Devani
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 Mayo 2020
    ... ... formal letters of assurance to the Home Office stating that Mr Devani would be detained in a ... undertaking was held to be defective, see Dzgoev v Russia [2017] EWHC 735 at para.68 and ... ...
  • General Prosecutors Office of Latvia and Marius Ancevskis
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 10 Diciembre 2021
    ...be successfully challenged if it is demonstrated that it is ‘wrong.’” To like effect is the decision in Dzgoey v Russian Federation [2017] EWHC 735 (Admin) at [23] – [24]. While neither of these decisions is binding as a matter of precedent on this court, we draw attention to them given our......
  • Jonah Horne and United States of America (No.3)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 29 Abril 2021
    ...Giese (No.2), and the court may consider a later assurance even if an earlier undertaking was held to be defective, see Dzgoev v Russia [2017] EWHC 735 at [68] and [87].” At [42] and [44] the court employed the language of “…. assurances which sufficiently mitigate the risk …” and assurance......
  • Michailovas, Viktoras and The Republic of Lithuania
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 21 Mayo 2021
    ...be successfully challenged if it is demonstrated that it is ‘wrong’”. To like effect is the decision in Dzgoey v Russian Federation [2017] EWHC 735 (Admin) at [23] – [24]. 57 While neither of these decisions is binding as a matter of precedent on this court, we draw attention to them given ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT