Stebbing v Liverpool and London and Globe Insurance Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1917 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 cases
-
Superwood Holdings Plc v Sun Alliance & London Insurance Plc
...Sticks Ltd. v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance (1993) 106 D.L.R. (4th) 497. Stebbing v. Liverpool and London and Globe Insurance Co. [1917] 2 K.B. 433; [1916-17] All E.R. 248; 86 L.J.K.B. 1155; 117 L.T. 247; 33 T.L.R. 395. Stikeman v. Dawson (1847) Ch.D. 107. Taylor v. Smyth [1991] 1 I.R.......
-
Heyman v Darwins Ltd
...type of case it is true that the contract may be avoided even from its inception, but as Lord Reading observed in Stebbing v. Liverpool London and Globe Insurance Company (1917), 2 K.B. 433, at p. 436: "the phrase 'avoiding the policy' is loosely used … In truth the Company is relying upon ......
- Dalmia Dairy Industries Ltd v National Bank of Pakistan
-
Macaura v Northern Assurance Company, Ltd and Others
...on the contrary, they rely on it and say that, according to its terms, express and implied, they are relieved from liability (see Stebbing's case, 1917, 2 K.B. 433; Woodall's case, 1919, 1 K.B. 593). It is a fallacy to say that they assert the policy to be null and void. They do not plead......
Request a trial to view additional results