Stebbing v Liverpool and London and Globe Insurance Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1917
Year1917
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
31 cases
  • Bond Air Services Ltd v Hill
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ...it necessary to refer to the many other authorities quoted during the argument because, as I have said, I think that Stebbing's caseF3833 T.L.R. 395 Geach v. Ingall (1845) 14 M. & W. 95 and Ashby v. Bates (1846) 15 M. & W. 589 explained. SPECIAL CASE stated by an arbitrator. The cla......
  • Superwood Holdings Plc v Sun Alliance & London Insurance Plc
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 27 June 1995
    ...Sticks Ltd. v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance (1993) 106 D.L.R. (4th) 497. Stebbing v. Liverpool and London and Globe Insurance Co. [1917] 2 K.B. 433; [1916-17] All E.R. 248; 86 L.J.K.B. 1155; 117 L.T. 247; 33 T.L.R. 395. Stikeman v. Dawson (1847) Ch.D. 107. Taylor v. Smyth [1991] 1 I.R.......
  • Dalmia Dairy Industries Ltd v National Bank of Pakistan
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Heyman v Darwins Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 February 1942
    ...type of case it is true that the contract may be avoided even from its inception, but as Lord Reading observed in Stebbing v. Liverpool London and Globe Insurance Company (1917), 2 K.B. 433, at p. 436: "the phrase 'avoiding the policy' is loosely used … In truth the Company is relying upon ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT