Steeds v Steeds
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1888 |
| Date | 1888 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Kenny D. Anthony Plaintiff v Peter Josie Defendant [ECSC]
...which ought to be known before rights are definitely decided. 24 The Supreme Court Practice 1995, Vol. 1, para. 18/19/3 at page 320. Steeds v. Steeds [1889] 22 Q.B.D. 537at 542 25 However, unless there is a reason to suppose that the case can be improved by amendment leave will not be given......
- Creamoata Ltd v the Rice Equalization Association Ltd
-
Sexton v Titiro Trustee Company Ltd and
...a parol release or rescission of a specialty contract is effectual if founded on or accompanied by consideration: Steeds v Steeds (1889) 22 Q.B.D. 537; Berry v Berry [1929] 2 K.B. We will examine later the question whether the conduct of the deceased gave rise to any equitable estoppel; but......
-
Berry v Berry
... ... According to the rule in equity, which must prevail, accord and satisfaction must be taken to be an answer to an action on a deed: Steeds v. Steeds.F4 If a deed can be discharged by a subsequent simple contract a fortiori it can be varied by the same means. In the present case the terms ... ...
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The legal and commercial frameworks
...from his position as head of the judiciary: see Lord Bingham, “he Old Order Changeth” (2006) 122 LQr 211. 80 In Steeds v Steeds (1889) 22 QBD 537 at 540, Wills J described the common law as being afected by “odious technicalities”. In Muscat v Smith [2003] 1 WLR 2853 at 2863 [38], Buxton LJ......