Steinman v Angier Line
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 21 March 1891 |
| Date | 21 March 1891 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Leesh River Tea Company Ltd v British India S.N. Company Ltd
... ... 11 In Stag Line Limited v. Foscolo, Mango & Co. Ltd. (1932 Appeal Cases page 328) Lord Atkin said: "For the ... ...
-
Glencore Energy UK Ltd v Freeport Holdings Ltd
...Mr Thomas relied on three cases on dissimilar facts: Taylor v. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co (1873–74) L.R. 9 Q.B. 546; Steinman & Co v Angier Line Ltd [1891] 1 Q.B. 619; and The Chasca (1875) LR 4 A & E 73 In Taylor v. Liverpool & GWS, on a case stated, the Court (Lush and Archibal......
-
Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Company
...1856, 11 Ex. 781 11 Ex. 781 Sharp v. Powell 26 L. T. Rep. 436 L. Rep. 7 C. P. 253 Steinman v. Angier LineDID=ASPMELR 7 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 46 64 L. T. Rep. 613 (1891) 1 Q. B. 691 London Joint Stock Bank v. Macmillan 119 L. T. Rep. 387 (1918) A. C. 777 Charter-party — Exceptions —‘Fire … alwa......
-
Nelson Line (Liverpool) Ltd v James Nelson & Sons Ltd
...297; Phillips v. Clark, 29 L. T. Rep. O. S. 181; 3 C. B, N. S. 156; Steinman v. Angier Line, 7 Asp. Mar. Law Cm. 46; 64 L. T. Rep. 613; (1891) 1 Q. B. 619 ; Owners of Cargo on 8hip Maori King v. Hughes, 8 Asp. Mat. Law Cas. 65; 73 L. T. Rep. 141; (1895) 2 Q. B. 550. J. A. Hamilton, K.C. was......
Request a trial to view additional results