Stephen v Stephen

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1931
Year1931
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Simmonds v Simmonds
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
    ...by which she had admittedly been influenced, was wrong. Sidney v. Sidney (1867) 36 L.J.P. & M. 73; Stephen v. Stephen [1931] P. 197; 47 T.L.R. 478; Hasting v. Hasting [1948] P. 68; 63 T.L.R. 564; [1947] 2 All E.R. 744 applied; Practice Direction [1954] 1 W.L.R. 898; [1954] 2 All E.R. 34......
  • Ghulam Mohammad Sayeed and Others v Perwira Habib Bank (M) Bhd and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1989
  • Tan Bee Giok v Loh Kum Yong
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 8 November 1996
    ...819; [1995] 2 SLR 231 (refd) Pascoe v Turner [1979] 1 WLR 431; [1979] 2 All ER 945 (folld) S v S [1986] Fam 189 (refd) Stephen v Stephen [1931] P 197 (folld) Wang Shi Huah Karen v Wong King Cheung Kevin [1992] 2 SLR (R) 172; [1992] 2 SLR 1025 (folld) Women's Charter (Cap 353,1985Rev Ed)ss 1......
  • WGM v WGN
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 26 September 2022
    ...A pre-condition to the operation of s 112 is the existence of a maintenance order: see Mills v Mills [1940] P 124 and Stephen v Stephen [1931] P 197. Consequently, if the order below stands the wife will be precluded forever from applying to court for maintenance. Thus, to retain the wife’s......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Bibliography
    • United States
    • Sage ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, The No. 197-1, May 1938
    • 1 May 1938
    ...The Annals of the American Acad- ten, 1937. Pp. 784. Stockholm: Nord. em,y of Political and Social Science, Sept. Bokhandeln, 1937. 1931, pp. 197-207. HOUSING KINBERG, 0. &dquo;Criminal Policy in in the Last Fifty Years,&dquo; Journal of BAUER, C. Modern Housing. Pp. 331. Criminal Law and C......