Stoeck v Public Trustee
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 28 April 1921 |
| Date | 28 April 1921 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 156 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Caglar
...then submitted that internal citizenship laws were a matter for the lex loci and not the lex fori and cited: Stoeck v Public Trustee [1921] 2 Ch 67; Re Chamberlain's Settlement [1921] 2 Ch; Oppenheimer v Cattermole [1976] AC 249; and Dicey and Morris at page 32. 188. Mr Beloff argued that, ......
-
Oppenheimer v Cattermole (HM Inspector of Taxes)
...conceals a fallacy. His argument can best be understood by starting from the observations of Russell J. in Stoeck v.Public Trustee [1921] 2 Ch. 67, at page 82. The learned Judge said: Whether a person is a national of a country must be determined by the municipal law of that country. Upon t......
-
Oppenheimer v Cattermole
...as a rule that the question of foreign nationality falls to be decided according to the municipal law of the foreign state concerned. (See Re Stoeck [1921] 2 Ch. 67, see especially p. 82.) According to English law that municipal law is a question of fact. 5 It is, of course, the case that R......
-
Koroitamana v Commonwealth of Australia
...v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562 at 596 [80]; Parry (ed), A British Digest of International Law, (1965), vol 6 at 3. 22Stoeck v Public Trustee [1921] 2 Ch 67 at 23 Australia, House of Representatives, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 19 February 1986 at 868. 24 Australia, House of Representative......
Request a trial to view additional results