Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Stoney v Eastbourne Rural Council

The Law Reports Cited authorities 5 Cited in 55 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1927
Year1927
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 cases
  • Letchumanan Chettiar Alagappan (as Executor to SL Alameloo Achi (Deceased)) and Another v Secure Plantation Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Walsh v Sligo County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 20 December 2010
    ...Dublin County Council v. Balfe (Unreported, High Court, Costello P., 3rd November, 1995). Stoney v. Eastbourne Rural District Council [1927] 1 Ch. 367; 24 L.G.R. 333. The State (Sheehan) v. The Government of Ireland[1987] I.R. 550; [1988] I.L.R.M. 437. Thomas v. Jones [1921] 1 K.B. 22. Trus......
  • Edward Walsh and Another v County Council for County of Sligo
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 11 November 2013
    ...Collen v Petters [2006] IEHC 205, [2007] 1 IR 790; Turner v. Walsh (1881) 6 App Cas 636; Stoney v Eastbourne Rural District Council [1927] 1 Ch 367; Williams-Ellis v Cobb [1935] 1 KB 310; Bright v Walker (1834) CM & R 211; R v Oxfordshire County Council, Ex P Sunningwell Parish Council [20......
  • Walsh & Cassidy v Sligo County Council
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 20 December 2010
    ...memory." He quoted with approval another passage, contained in the judgment of Romer J. in Stoney v. Eastbourne Rural District Council [1927] 1 Ch. 367 at 378, which states:- "As pointed out by Buckley J. in Attorney-General v. Esher Linoleum Co. [ [1901] 2 Ch. 647], it is dedication and no......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Public Rights of Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...a period of 18 months was held to be sufficient. 42 Poole v Huskinson (1843) 11 M & W 827 at 830. See also e.g. Stoney v Eastbourne RDC [1927] 1 Ch 367; Mann v Brodie (1885) 10 App Cas 378 at 386. 43 See e.g. R v South Eastern Railway Co (1850) 16 LT (OS) 124; Macpherson v Scottish Rights o......
  • Creation of Highways
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part III. Public rights of way
    • 30 August 2016
    ...a period of 18 months was held to be sufficient. 20 Poole v Huskinson (1843) 11 M & W 827 at 830. See also e.g. Stoney v Eastbourne RDC [1927] 1 Ch 367; Mann v Brodie (1885) 10 App Cases 378 at 386. 21 See e.g. R v South Eastern Railway Co (1850) 16 LT (OS) 124; Macpherson v Scottish Rights......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT