Storey v Ashton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of the Queen's Bench
Date1865
Year1865

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • Metropolitan Parks and Markets Ltd et Al v Swaby (Percival)
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 5 March 2004
    ...to divest the employer of all liability is a question of degree as to how far the deviation could be considered a separate journey. See Storey v Ashton (1869) LR 4QB 476. 31 In any event, the evidence is that Mr. Waison intended to take Mr. Swaby to his destination on Spanish Town Road bef......
  • Morris v C. W. Martin & Sons Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 19 May 1965
    ...garage proprietor for the simple reason that at the time of the accident the servant was not acting in the course of his employment, see Storey v. Ashton (1869) Law Reports, 4 Queen's Bench, p. 476. You might think also that the owner of The car could not recover, and for the self-same reas......
  • Campbell, Allan v National Fuel & Lubricants Ltd et Al
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 2 November 2004
    ...cannot now be followed since the law has now moved decisively away from the old construct. 71 71. From this it follows that the case of Storey v Ashton (1869) 4 QB 476 relied on by the first and second defendants either has to be accepted as one in which the failure by the employee to retur......
  • Feldman (Pty) Ltd v Mall
    • South Africa
    • Appellate Division
    • 7 August 1945
    ...Sleath v Wilson (9 C. & P. 607); 1853, Mitchell v Crasweller (13, C.B. 237); 1868, Whatman v Pearson (3 C.P. 422); 1869, Storey v Ashton (4 Q.B. 476), 1891, Coupe Co. v Maddick (1891, 2 Q.B. 413); 1904. Watermeyer, C.J. Sanderson v Collins (1904, 1 K.B. 628); 1912, Lloyd v Grace, Smith & Co......
  • Get Started for Free