Strange (S. W.) Ltd v Mann

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1965
Date1965

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Smile Inc. Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd v Lui Andrew Stewart
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 16 December 2011
    ...[1895] 2 QB 1 (folld) Robin M Bridge v Deacons [1984] 1 AC 705 (refd) Routh v Jones [1947] 1 All ER 179 (refd) S W Strange Ltd v Mann [1965] 1 WLR 629 (folld) Samsung Semiconductor Europe Ltd v Docherty 2011 SLT 806 (refd) Sanders v Parry [1967] 1 WLR 753 (refd) Shepherds Investments Ltd v ......
  • Eastbourne Borough Council v Foster
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 July 2001
    ...except so far as his duties are altered and his salary is increased, the old terms and conditions remain the same." 20 In S W Strange Ltd v. Mann [1965] 1 WLR 629 the employer entered into a new agreement with its manager: it was held that the new oral agreement entirely superseded the earl......
  • Reeves and Another v Marfield Insurance Brokers CC and Another
    • South Africa
    • 28 March 1996
    ...v Venter and Another 1993 (1) SA 409 (W) Sunshine Records (Pty) Ltd v Frohling and Others 1990 (4) SA 782 (A) S W Strange Ltd v Mann [1965] 1 All ER 1069 (Ch) Wells v South African Alumenite Co 1927 AD 69. Case Information B Appeal from a decision in the Eastern Cape Division (Van Rensburg ......
  • Centre for Creative Leadership (CCL) Pte Ltd v Byrne Roger Peter and others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 11 January 2013
    ...and is likely to be leveraged in some way by the employee to gain some degree of influence (see Smile HC at [75]; S W Strange Ltd v Mann [1965] 1 WLR 629 at 641). Apart from knowledge of the employer’s customers, there are several other factors which are relevant to the issue of influence (......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Illegality
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Vitiating Factors
    • 4 August 2020
    ...165 Routh v Jones , [1947] 1 All ER 758 (CA); Mills v Gill , [1952] 3 DLR 27 (Ont HCJ). 166 See, for example, SW Strange Ltd v Mann , [1965] 1 All ER 1069 (Ch); Winnipeg Livestock Sales Ltd v Plewman (2000), 192 DLR (4th) 525 (Man CA). 167 See generally Trebilcock, above note 131 at 99–106.......
  • Case Comment: The enforceability of restraint of trade provisions within a wrongfully terminated contract of employment
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...he is free from every part of the contract. . .'. This decision was relied on in several later cases, including SW Strange Ltd v Mann [1965] 1 All ER 1069, where it was held that the wrongful dismissal of the employee constituted a repudiation of the service agreement, thereby relieving the......