Stuart Layden v R

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeLord Justice Jeremy Baker
Judgment Date23 May 2025
Neutral Citation[2025] EWCA Crim 659
Year2025
Docket NumberCase No: 2025-01163B4

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Jamie Jenkins v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 18 December 2025
    ...general interfere with lawful sentences based on events occurring after sentence except in rare and exceptional cases (see R v Layden [2025] EWCA Crim 659 at [27] and [31], and, as to the circumstances under which it may be appropriate to act, see R v Prenga [2017] EWCA Crim 2149 at [37]–......
  • Damien Osmond v The King
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 4 July 2025
    ...was not submitted on behalf of the Crown, correctly for the reason we have given, that the approach of this court explained in R v. Layden [2025] EWCA Crim 659 prevents this court from following Vowles in this 30 The evidence about the different release and post-release regimes is of partic......
  • R v Thomasz Mysiak
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 11 July 2025
    ...this court still has an exceptional power to consider crediting the days if it is in the interests of justice to do so: see R v Stuart Layden [2025] EWCA Crim 659. 13 We accept that this power exists. We must consider whether it is in the interests of justice that we should exercise that po......