Stuart v Goldberg Linde

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Neutral Citation[2007] EWHC 878 (QB)
Date2007
Year2007

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
66 cases
  • Henley v Bloom
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 March 2010
    ...“should not keep quiet in the hope of improving their position in respect of a claim arising out of similar facts or evidence in the future”– [2008] 1 WLR 823, paragraph 96. However, as he went on to indicate in paragraph 98, much depended on the particular facts, and “the question is not ......
  • Kotonou v National Westminster Bank Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 5 July 2010
    ... ... Group plc [2008] 1 WLR 748 at [16] per Thomas LJ, whose comments were again considered in Stuart v Lindberg Linde (a firm) [2008] EWCA Civ 2 , in particular, at [76] and [81]. Applying those ... of the court are entirely compatible with the requirements of Article 6: see Stuart v Goldberg & Linde [2008] EWCA Civ 2 at [65] per Lloyd LJ ... 106 I can now ... ...
  • John Alexander Melvin Hemming v Sonia Vanessa Poulton
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 24 November 2023
    ... ... of whether the claimant should have brought their claim as part of the earlier proceedings: Stuart v Golberg Linde [2008] EWCA Civ 2 ; [2008] 1 WLR 823, CA , cited in the White Book at 3.4.5 ... ...
  • Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 May 2023
    ... ... and Farhad Azima Defendant and Counterclaimant Respondent (1) Stuart Robert Page (2) David Neil Gerrard (3) Dechert LLP (4) James Edward ... open to the judge or was, in the view of the appeal court, plainly wrong: see Stuart v Goldberg Linde [ [2008] EWCA Civ 2 ; [2008] 1 WLR 823 ] per Sir Anthony Clarke MR at [81]–[82] and ... ...
  • Get Started for Free