Sunshine Porcelain Potteries Pty. Ltd v Nash

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1961
Year1961
Date1961
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
  • Hamilton v Hamilton
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 9 February 1982
    ...v. Minister for Education [1941] I.R. 430. 11 Reid v. Reid (1886) 31 Ch.D. 402. 12 Sunshine Porcelain Potteries Pty. Ltd. v. Nash. [1961] A.C. 927. 13 Nestor v. Murphy [1979] I.R. 326. 14 Kyne v. Tiernan (High Court: 15th July 1980). 15 Somers v. W. [1979] I.R. 94. 16 Wroth v. Tyler [1974] ......
  • Durham v Thorpe Campbell Holdings Ltd and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 21 November 2008
    ...354. This decision of the Privy Council was subsequently found to have been wrong (in a later decision of the Privy Council, Sunshine Porcelain Properties Pty v Nash [1961] AC 927 (“ Sunshine”)) in concluding, in the case of a workman disabled by a scheduled disease, that the effect of the ......
  • Deborah Barlow v Wigan Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 19 June 2019
    ...after the Act came into force. In that regard I was referred to the observations of Lord Reid in Sunshine Porcelain Potteries v Nash [1961] AC 927, giving the judgment of the House, at p938: “Generally, there is a strong presumption that a legislature does not intend to impose a new liabili......
  • Westminster City Council v Haywood (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 20 December 1999
    ...force. The guiding principles of construction were authoritatively stated by Lord Reid in Sunshine Porcelain Potteries Pty Ltd v NashELR ((1961) AC 927, 938). The principles had been further elaborated by Lord Mustill in l'Office Cherifien v Yamashita LtdELR ((1994) AC 486, 524). The questi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Reinstatement in the Context of ‘Deemed Dismissal’: A Critical Analysis of Recent Case Law
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , October 2022
    • 24 October 2022
    ...para 27.101Du Toit para 10. See also Bellairs v Hodnett 1978 (1) SA 1109 (A) at 1148F–G andSunshine Porcelain Potteries Pty Ltd v Nash [1961] AC 927 at 938.https://doi.org/10.47348/SAMLJ/v34/i1a1(2022) 34 SA MERC LJ24© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd not rendered services to the SAPS for several......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT