T v T and Another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1988 |
| Date | 1988 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
MB v RB
...L.J. considered. (3) F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation), In re, [1990] 2 A.C. 1; [1989] 2 W.L.R. 1025, applied. (4) T v. TELRWLRUNKFLR, [1988] Fam. 52; [1988] 2 W.L.R. 189; [1988] 1 All E.R. 613; [1988] 1 F.L.R. 400; sub nom. Re T (Abortion: Sterilization), [1988] Fam. Law 126, applied. (5) ......
-
Re R (A Child) (IVF: Paternity of Child)
... ... If there is to be any opprobrium stemming from the birth of a child to parents who are not married to one another (and for my part I would not necessarily say that there was to be any such opprobrium), it should be attached to the parents, whose choice it was, and not to the child, whose choice it most definitely was not. I very much hope the Incorporated Council will pay attention to those observations should ... ...
-
Re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation); F v West Berkshire HA
...agree that this extends to limiting doctors to treatment upon the necessity for which there are 'no two views' (per Wood J. in T. v. T. [1988] Fam. 52, 62). There will always or usually be a minority view and this approach, if strictly applied, would often rule out all treatment. On the oth......
- Secretary Department of Health and Community Services v Jwb (Marion's Case)
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
From ‘Doctor Knows Best’ to Dignity: Placing Adults Who Lack Capacity at the Centre of Decisions About Their Medical Treatment
...no mention of the patient’s views,values or beliefs. Instead, when deciding what medical treatment was in a23 Two years earlier, in TvT[1988] Fam 52, doctors had sought legal protection for their decisionto terminate a mentally incapacitated woman’s pregnancy and sterilise her at the same t......