Taff Vale Railway Company v Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 22 July 1901 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1901] UKHL J0722-2 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 22 July 1901 |
[1901] UKHL J0722-2
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel, as well on Friday the 12th as Monday the 15th and Tuesday the 16th days of this instant July, upon the Petition and Appeal of the Taff Vale Railway Company, of Cardiff, in the county of Glamorgan, praying, That the matter of the Orders set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, two Orders of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 21st of November 1900, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Orders might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed case of the Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; And due consideration being had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in the Court of Parliament of His Majesty the King assembled, That the said two Orders of Her late Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 21st day of November 1900, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same are hereby, Reversed, and that the two Judgments of Mr. Justice Farwell, of the 5th day of September 1900, be, and the same are hereby, Restored: And it is further Ordered, That the Respondents do pay, or cause to be paid, to the said Appellants the costs incurred by them in the Courts below, and also the costs incurred by them in respect of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Heatons Transport (St. Helens) Ltd v TGWU (Interim Proceedings)
...responsible for it. In this respect the case is, to my mind, not governed by the decision of the House of Lords in the Taff Vale case 1901 A.C. 426. but by the later decision in Denaby and Cadeby Main Collieries Ltd. v. Yorkshire Miners Association 1906 A.C. 59I would therefore allow the ap......
-
Bonsor v Musicians' Union
...of authorities of which the first is the well-known case of The Taff Vale Railway Company v. The Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants [1901] A.C. 426. In that case it was held by this House that a trade union registered under the Trade Union Acts, 1871 and 1876, could be sued in tort for......
-
Re SPhinX Group
...1 W.L.R. 580; [1986] 2 All E.R. 551; [1986] BCLC 207, referred to. (17) Taff Vale Ry. Co. v. Amalgamated Socy. of Railway Servants, [1901] A.C. 426, dicta of Lord Lindley applied. (18) Tilling v. Whiteman, [1980] A.C. 1; [1979] 2 W.L.R. 401; [1979] 1 All E.R. 737; [1979] J.P.L. 834, referre......
-
Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church of Canada St. Mary Cathedral v. Aga,
...of Dunraven, [1897] A.C. 59; Orchard v. Tunney, [1957] S.C.R. 436; Taff Vale Railway Co. v. Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants, [1901] A.C. 426; Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759. Statutes and Regulations Cited Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 2 (a). Corpora......
-
Up The Creek Without A Paddle: The Law Relating To Unincorporated Associations
...1958 CarswellOnt 156 (Ont. C.A.). 11 Orchard, supra, footnote 10. 12 Taff Vale Railway v. Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants, [1901] A.C. 426 (U.K. H.L.); Bonsor v. Musicians' Union (1955), [1956] A.C. 104, [1955] 3 All E.R. 518 (U.K. The content of this article is intended to provide ......
-
Action
...Board. Arthur Crest. J., after referring to the dictum of Lord Halsbury’s in Taff Vale Ry Co. v. Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants (1901) A.C. 426, 436 ob-served at 133 of the Report, and quite rightly in my view:- “Although in the Taff Vale case emphasis was laid on an unincorporated......
-
The Legal Personality of the Commonwealth of Australia
...Police of Metropolis [1991] 1 WLR 1362,1371 [H] (Purchas LJ) (CA).22. See Taff Vale Railway Co v Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants [1901] AC 426 (‘Taff ValeCase’); Chaff and Hay Acquisition Committee Case (1947) 74 CLR 375, 384–6 (Latham CJ), 390(Starke J), 396–7 (Williams J); Church ......
-
Rethinking the Approval of Class Counsel's Fees in Ontario Class Actions
...Books, 1999) at 179. 53 Smith, above note 23; Ben-Hur, above note 23; Taff Vale Railway v. Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants, [1901] A. C. 426 (H.L.). Note that the case law in the United Kingdom and the United States follow a similar pattern, but are nevertheless separated by several......
-
Class Reunion: Revisiting Class Action Justification After Twenty Years
...35 36 37 38 [1901] AC 1 (HL) [Duke of Bedford]. Ontario Law Reform Commission, above note 10 at 11. Duke of Bedford, above note 34 at 8. [1901] AC 426 at 443 (HL). [1910] 2 KB 1021 (CA) The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview In Markt, owners of shipped goods brought a class action against a......