Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust v CH

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1996
Date1996
Year1996
CourtFamily Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT) v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Protection
    • 29 January 2020
    ...protection of personal autonomy. Thus: “21. We turn now to consider some of the caesarian section decisions. In Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust v CH [1996] 1 FLR 762 the patient was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and was admitted under section 3 of the Mental Health Act 198......
  • Re M B (Caesarian section)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 March 1997
  • GJ v The Foundation Trust and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 20 November 2009
    ...‘treatment for mental disorder’ if such treatment is likely to directly affect the mental disorder. 68 53. As to (f) in Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust v CH [1996] 1 FLR 762, Wall J considered a caesarean section operation (CS) could be authorised as treatment for mental disorder......
  • JK v A Local Health Board
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 13 November 2019
    ...about the impoundment of his passport was held to be not a manifestation or symptom of his mental disorder. In Tameside and Glossop Acute Services v CH [1996] 1 FLR 762 it was held that section 63 could be used to restrain a patient to enforce a Caesarean section upon her; while in St Georg......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Contesting the Rule of Emotions? The Press and Enforced Caesareans
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Social & Legal Studies No. 9-4, December 2000
    • 1 December 2000
    ...Healthcare NHS Trust vS; R vCollins and others, ex parte S[1998] 3 AllER 673Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust vCH (A Patient) [1996] 1 FCR 753REFERENCESActes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales (1994) ‘L’Emprise du Journalisme’ 101–2.Bourdieu, P. (1987) ‘The Force of Law: Towards a......