Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
Neutral Citation[2009] UKEAT 0410_08_1908
Year2009
Date2009

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Nationwide Building Society v Benn and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date
  • Mr D Cornish v City Facilities Management (UK) Ltd: 4100903/2020
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • June 18, 2021
    ...change to material detriment is a question of fact and degree, which has been considered in cases such as Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust [2009] IRLR 972 in which the EAT said that the test of whether the 'substantial change' is to the 'material detriment' of the employee reg 4......
  • Mrs J Davies v Droylsden Academy: 2403451/2015
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • March 1, 2017
    ...22. Miss Connolly directs me to the authorities of Mitie Managed Services Limited v French [2002] IRLR 512 and Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust [2009] IRLR 972. She says that the terms of the bonus scheme will not transfer if they are impossible to perform such as to produce an ......
  • Ms A Plaza v Trevor-Roberts School and Intercontinental Facility Services Ltd: 2202286/2019
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • April 6, 2020
    ...analysis what occurred did not amount to an objection if someone in fact did not know what they were doing.” 6 In Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust [2009] IRLR 972 the EAT held that the phrase “working conditions” in regulation 4(9) applied to contractual terms as well as physica......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Two Recent TUPE Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • May 2, 2012
    ...detriment pursuant to regulation 4(9) TUPE. The EAT approved the Tribunal's application of Tapere v South London and Maudsley NHS Trust [2009] IRLR 972, which held that the question of whether there has been a substantial change is a question of fact to be determined by reference to the nat......