Tatam v Reeve

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Date1893
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Overseas Union Insurance Ltd v AA Mutual International Insurance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
  • C.H.T. Ltd v Ward
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 7 November 1963
    ...Queen's Bench page 779, where a commission agent was held entitled to recover a lost bet from his principal, despite the 1845 Act. 14 In Tatem v. Reeve (1893 1 Queen's Bench page 44), the Act was applied in a case where a plaintiff who had been no party to the bets paid the defendant's bett......
  • Khodari v Tamimi
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 October 2009
    ...payment out of his own funds. 21 The main purpose of the Act of 1892 was to reverse the effect of the decision in Read v. Anderson: see Tatam v. Reeve [1893] 1 QB 44, per Wills J at 47. Study of the words of the Act, set out at [15] above, makes that clear: a principal's implied promise to ......
  • Mrs Daad Sharab v His Royal Highness Prince Al-Waleed and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 29 June 2012
    ...and the formula "in respect of" (tested by reference to English law) is wider than "under a contract": see e.g. Tatam v. Reeve [1893] 1 QB 44. The provision in the CPR is in this regard deliberately wider than the provision in its predecessor RSC Order 11. In this regard......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT