Tate & Lyle Food and Distribution Ltd v Greater London Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1981
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
168 cases
  • International Credit & Inv Company (Overseas) Ltd v Adham
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 22 October 1996
    ...53 D.L.R. (3d) 748; [1976] 1 S. Ct. Rep. 267, followed. (5) -Tate & Lyle Food & Distrib. Ltd. v. Greater London Council, [1982] 1 W.L.R. 149; [1981] 3 All E.R. 716, distinguished. (6) -Wood v. Grand Valley Ry. Co.UNK(1915), 22 D.L.R. 614; 51 S. Ct. Rep. 283, dicta of Davies J. applied. Tort......
  • Assetco Plc v Grant Thornton UK LLP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 22 February 2019
    ...from the conventional rate of 1% above base (and sometimes even less) available to first class borrowers.” In Tate & Lyle Food and Distribution v Greater London Council [1982] 1 WLR 149 [154 C-E], Forbes J stated, in passages that have since been quoted in many subsequent cases on interest......
  • Sabic UK Petrochemicals Ltd (formerley Huntsman Petrochemicals (UK) Ltd) v Punj Lloyd Ltd (a company incorporated in India) (by original action)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 10 October 2013
    ...account at the bank which was permanently in credit." 9 SABIC also relies upon what Forbes J said in Tate & Lyle Distribution v GLC [1982] 1 WLR 149, 154C and 155D when rejecting the submission that the Court should look at what the receiving party would in fact have done with the money if ......
  • Lethe Estate Ltd and Great River Rafting and Plantation Tour Ltd v Jamaica Public Services Company Ltd
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 23 February 2018
    ...rate. He urged the court to be guided by the principles in Tate & Lyle Food Distribution Ltd. v Greater London Council & another [1981] 3 All E.R. 716 where Forbes J said:- “ …I do not think the modern law is that interest is awarded against the defendant as a punitive measure for having ke......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...whether to apply a foreign rate of interest, and if so which one. 1298 Tate & Lyle Food & Distribution Ltd v Greater London Council [1982] 1 WLR 149 at 154, per Forbes J; Bridge UK.Com Ltd v Abbey Pynford plc [2007] EWHC 728 (TCC) at [145]–[146], per Ramsey J; Claymore Services Ltd v Nautil......
  • Any Excuse for Certainty: English Perspectives on the Defence of ‘Reasonable Excuse’
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 74-5, October 2010
    • 1 October 2010
    ...the previous law, see Ormerod, above n. 21 at 900. 79 Criminal Damage Act 1971, s. 5(2)(a).80 Criminal Damage Act 1971, s. 5(2)(b).81 [1981] 3 All ER 716.82 G. Williams, ‘Two Nocturnal Blunders’ (1990) 140 NLJ 1564 as cited in above n. 21 at 902. 484 Any Excuse for Certainty: English Perspe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT