Teasdale & others v HSBC Bank Plc & others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year2010
Date2010
CourtMercantile Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • 1) Fortress Value Recovery Fund I Llc and Others v Blue Skye Special Opportunites Fund L.P. (A Firm)and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 January 2013
    ...... interests in financial intermediaries, which had been raised in discussions with the Bank of Italy during 2010. The defendants say that they were concerned that Cypress Way and ZBS would ... . 120 The presumption this creates is very hard to displace. In Teasdale v HSBC Bank plc [2010] EWHC 612 (QB), HHJ Waksman QC considered the earlier authorities and ......
  • Blanchfield v Blanchfield; Blanchfield v Blanchfield
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 19 February 2015
    ...summarized the eight principles stated set out by Judge Waksman QC in the seven test cases reported sub nom Teasdale v. Bank plc 2010 4 All E.R. 630] in Brookes v. HSBC Bank plc, the first being that “when a claimant discontinues the proceedings, there is a presumption by reason of CPR 38.6......
  • Raymond Bieber & Others v Teathers Ltd ((in Liquidation)) Robert & Rebecca Willer Teathers Ltd ((in Liquidation))
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 16 January 2014
    ...38.6 has been the subject of guidance from the Court of Appeal, endorsing the observations of His Honour Judge Waksman QC, sitting in Teesdale v HSBC Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 354, and that guidance must also inform the exercise of the discretion. 3 That guidance reminds me that (a) there is a p......
  • Thusi v Minister of Home Affairs and Another and 71 Other Cases
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Newspapers Ltd [1991] 2 All ER 398 (HL): referred to E M v Home Office [1993] 3 All ER 537 (HL): referred to Teasdale v HSBC Bank plc [2010] 4 All ER 630 (QB): Unreported cases Rogers v Hendricks (CPD case Nos 1555/04 and 9471/06, 15 September 2006): referred F to Zeman v Quickelberge and A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT