Tecbild Ltd v Chamberlain
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1969 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
37 cases
-
Roberts v Crown Estate Commissioners
...piece of land must depend upon the nature of the land and what it is capable of use for: see, for example, Tecbild Ltd v Chamberlain (1969) 20 P & CR 633, at p 641. I am quite satisfied that between 1945 and 1964 the only profitable use of this land was for shooting. Our attention was drawn......
-
Wallis's Cayton Bay Holiday Camp Ltd v Shell-Mex and B.P. Ltd
...continues year after year for 12 years, or more: see Light v. Jack (1879) 5 Ex. D.264; Williams Bros, v. Raftery (1958) 1 Q.B. 159; Tecbild Ltd. v. Chamberlin (1969) P. & C.R.633 The reason is notbecause the user does not amount to actual possession. The line between acts of user and acts o......
-
Buckinghamshire County Council v Moran
...in Powell v. McFarlane (at pp.472–474) I considered in some detail the decisions in Leigh v. Jack and Williams v. Raftery and Tecbild Ltd. v. Chamberlain [1969] 20 P. & C.R. 633. I do not propose to embark on a similar analysis in this judgment, but would venture to repeat certain conclusio......
-
Port of London Authority v Ashmore
...because it has been observed in many authorities that in order to avoid self-serving declarations, in the words of Sachs LJ in Tecbild Ltd v. Chamberlain (1969) 20 P.&C.R.633: “In general, intent has to be inferred from the acts themselves.” 34 I refer again to the guidance given by Lords B......
Request a trial to view additional results