The "Guilliaume Tell"-(Sannier, Commander)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 13 July 1808 |
Date | 13 July 1808 |
Court | High Court of Admiralty |
English Reports Citation: 165 E.R. 1013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ADMIRALTY
S. C. 2 Eng Pr. Cas 1
the " guilliaume tell "-(Sanmer, Commander) July 13, 1808 -Co-operation in the blockade of Malta -Claim of joint capture by ships stationed at different _ points in support of the blockade, established [S. C. 2 Eng Pr. Cas 1 ] The present question arose on a claim of joint capture interposed on behalf of His Majesty's ships " Culloden " and " Northumberland," on the ground of associated service ior the purpose, among other objects, of effecting this capture -The prize was a French ship of war, which with another had been for some time blockaded in the harbour of La Valetta in the island of Malta, by a British squadron then under the orders of Sir Thomas Trowbridge, commander of His Majesty's ship " Culloden," acting in the absence of Lord Nelson. In the night of the 29th of March 1800, the " Guilliaume Tell " made an attempt to escape, but was pursued and taken by the " Foudroyant,'' and some other ships belonging to the blockading squadron, while the remainder kept their stations off the port, except the '' Culloden " and " Northumberland, ' which were at anchor at the time in the Marsa Sirocco Bay, a few miles distant from La Valetta [7] An objection was taken to the evidence of Lieutenant Oliver of the " Northumberland," who was stationed at a signal post on the island, and threw up rockets when the " Guilliaume Tell " was putting to sea, as it appeared that he belonged to one of the ships claiming to share, and had not released his interest. It was admitted, that although he was not on board at the toH/mfnteHirnl of the chase, he was on board during part of the time. The Court said,-That the question was of some nicety, whether this officer would be entitled to share, supposing he was not on board, on account of the intelligence he was the means of conveying ; but that it should allow his evidence to be read, subject to all objections For the actual captors, Lawrence and Swabey -Two witnesses only have been examined upon the allegation given on the part of the " Culloden '' and "k Northum- 1014 THE "GUILLIAUME TELL" BDW. 8. beriand " Lieutenant Oliver of the " Northumberland " and M'Donald, the master's mate of the " Culloden." If Lieutenant Oliver is an incompetent witness, their case must depend entirely upon the evidence of M'Donald, who is a releasing witness, and whose testimony therefore, taken alone, cannot support a claim of this nature. He states, " that about twelve o'clock on the night when the enemy put to sea, having gone up to the mast-head of the ' Oulloden ' to look out, he saw the rockets and blue lights which Lieutenant Oliver threw up on observing the French ship ' Le Guilliaume Tell ' haul out from the harbour. And in about ten minutes afterwards (it being very dark, the moon having gone down and the wind blowing strong out of the said harbour of La Valetta) he heard guns firing from ships [8] off the said harbour, and very soon after saw the flashes from the said ships' guns in three directions That he continued to look out there (except at short intervals, when he went to communicate with the commanding officer) till about half-past three o'clock in the morning, by which tune the three engaging ships had got so far to the N.N E. that he could no longer see the flashes from the guns " ; and he adds, " that when he came clown upon the deck of the said ship to report to the commanding officer, the flashes from the guns of the said engaging ships were plainly seen from the poop." Now how does this accord with the evidence of Lieutenant M'Kenzie and the three other witnesses, examined on behalf of the actual captors ? They state, that at the time the first guns were discharged from any of the chasing ships they must have been twelve or fifteen miles from Marsa Sirocco Bay, and as the prize and the chasing ships were all that to windward, and the wind blew strong, it is hardly...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Minister for Justice and Equality v Kenneth Brunell
...395 2011/43/12423 2011 IESC 1 MIN FOR JUSTICE v BAILEY UNREP SUPREME 1.3.2012 2012/25/7268 2012 IESC 16 MIN FOR JUSTICE v CONNOLLY UNREP EDWARDS 6.12.2012 2012 IEHC 575 MIN FOR JUSTICE v HOLDEN UNREP EDWARDS 11.2.2013 2013 IEHC 62 MIN FOR JUSTICE v JOCIENCE UNREP EDWARDS 31.5.2013 2013 IEHC......
-
Sanders's Case, by Conviction of Easter Term
...forth; and the same has been recognised iu 6 T. E. 177, Sex v. Davis.(k) The magistrate ought to state in the conviction the the statutes of Edw. 6 is a confession in open Court, or pleading guilty: any other confession, whether made to persons in authority or not, is evidence in the case, ......
-
Thursby and Others v Plant
...675, Doe v. Brndten. 1 Nev. & P. 650, S. C.) A mere attornment within the above definition does not require any stamp. 5 A. & E. 95, Doe v. Edwards. 6 Nev. & M. 633, S. C. 2 M. & W. 768, Barry v. Goodman. So where one Banks had brought ejectment against the tenant, and had recovered but did......
-
William Hill, Plaintiff, in an Action of Trespass, and John Grange, Defendant
...person may enter for conditions broken by the express words of the statute 32 H. 8. cap. 34. And so may the patentees of a reversion of King Edw. 6. and of all other heirs of King H. 8. if not by the express words, yet by the equity of the statute. S. C. Dy. 130. pi. 69. Bro. Entry Congeabl......
-
Global Food, Drug and Medical Device Newsletter
...of the national authorities. However, a different interpretation may still be lawful. by Sebastián Romero Melchor and Vanessa C. Edwards 6 Global Food, Drug, and Medical Device Global Food, Drug, and Medical Device 7 Blanket Ban on Animal Testing on Cosmetics Enters into Force The European ......
-
FLINT OF OUTRAGE.
...Charged over Tainted Water, N.Y. TIMES (Dec. 20, 2016), http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/20/us/flint-water-charges.html?emc=etal; Breanna Edwards, 6 Mich. Stale Employees Facing Criminal Charges in Flint Water Crisis, THE ROOT (July 29, 2016), http://www.ther-oot.com/articles/news/2016/07/6-m......
-
FIDUCIARY LAW AND THE LAW OF PUBLIC OFFICE.
...On the Nineteen Propositions, see BRADDICK, GOD'S FURY, supra note 112, at 192-93, 210, 297. (126.) Sale of Offices Act 1551, 5 & 6 Edw. 6c. 16[section] 1, reprinted in 4 STATUTES OF THE REALM, supra note 32, at (127.) See, e.g., Treason Act 1554, 1 & 2 Phil. & M. c. 10, [sectio......
-
Understanding Librarians in an IT age
...than any other computer user. Car owners are not necessarily expert mechanics, tyre specialists or road builders. The excellent article by Edwards6 discusses the impact and issues relating to change in an academic library and gives numerous examples of opinions of librarians to their changi......
-
Indirect Contributions to the Purchase of Property
...here. The various excuses M deemed it necessary to proffer to F for choosing to vest legal title in his sole name would, following Grant v Edwards6 and Eves v Eves,’ have been sufficient evidence of ‘common intention.’ M’s assertion that he intended to marry F and look after her would not q......
-
Statute Law (Repeals) Act 2013
...111. Reference Extent of repeal police act 1969 (c.63) The whole Act. Reference Extent of rep eal sale of offices act 1551 (5 & 6 edw.6 c.16) The whole Act. sale of offices act 1809 (49 geo.3 c.126) The whole Act. government of ireland (adaptation of enactments) (no.3) order 1922 (sr&am......
-
Statute Law Revision Act, 2007
...1494-95 (10 Hen. 7) c. 11 Act of resumption of land into the King's hands 1494-95 (10 Hen. 7) c. 14 Cancelling of records done in the name of Edw. 6 (Lambert Simnel) 1494-95 (10 Hen. 7) c. 15 No person to be Lord of St. Johns Jerusalem unless of English blood 1494-95 (10 Hen. 7) c. 16 Lord ......
-
Huddersfield Corporation Act 1949
...user of lands: And whereas it is expedient to extend the period limited by the Huddersfield Corporation Act 1937 for the construction of 1 Edw.6 8 & the waterworks authorised by that Act as extended by the c* p?°tox Huddersfield (Extension of Time) (No. 2) Order 1946: * ' And whereas it is ......
-
Ludlow Corporation charity estates: effecting an agreement, appropriating Act 1846
...or Auditors of the said King for His Lordship of Ludlow, and Charter of not to the King's Exchequer: And whereas King Edward the Sixth Edw. 6., by His Charter or Letters Patent, bearing Date at Westminster on the Aatril fnthe Twenty-sixth Day of April in the Sixth Year of His Reign, did 6th......