The Hagen
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 05 March 1908 |
Date | 05 March 1908 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
136 cases
-
Coast Lines Ltd v Hudig & Veder Chartering N.v (Brandaris, Grangefield)
...them to come to England to contest a case against them. So we must be exceedingly careful before doing so. That was pointed out long ago: The Hagen (1908) P. 189. If the Netherlands Courts were free to apply the proper law of the contract (i. e. English law), I would not be disposed to gran......
- Chua Toh Hua and Another v Lee Cheng Giam and Another
- Tengku Ahmad Tajudin bin Tengku Ibrahim, Re Application by
-
The Berny
...98E-G, 99B-D). Dicta of Pearson J. inSoci�t� G�n�rale de Paris v. Dreyfus Brothers (1885) 2(1885) 29 Ch.D. 2393; Farwell L.J. inThe Hagen [1908] P. 189, 201, C.A. and Lord Denning M.R. and Megaw L.J. in The Banco [1971] P. 137, 153, 158-159, C.A. applied. (2) That on an application for the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In Ireland: Irish Court Of Appeal Update
...on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 21 December 1988 and 2007. 3 The Hagen [1908] P 189. 4 Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v OAO Tomskneft VNK [2014] IEHC 5 The Respondents intended raising the following defences, amongst others: (a) The A......
3 books & journal articles
-
Fog in the Gateway: Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc
...69 LTR 666, 667 per Lord Esher MR; Soci´et´eG´en´erale de Paris vDreyfus Brothers (1885)29 ChD 239, 242-243 per Pear son J ; The Hagen [1908] P 189; The Brabo n 52 above, 357 perLord Normand; Vitkovice n 32 above, 882 per Lord Radcliffe. On the relevance of internationalperspectives, see fu......
-
JURISDICTION ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL TORT LITIGATION: A SINGAPORE VIEW
...All ER 756. 11 Johnson v Taylor Bros [1920] AC 144. 12 The Siskina [1979] AC 210. But contra Carter (1981) 52 BYBIL 319, 320. 13 The Hagen [1908] P 189. 14 Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran, supra, note 10. 15 Seaconsar Far East Ltd, supra, note 10. Subject to choic......
-
FORUM NON CONVENIENS : ENGLISH OR AUSTRALIAN APPROACH?
...n.2 15 Supra, n.1 16 Supra, n.1 17 (1988) 62 ALJ 774 at p. 782 18 Supra, n. 17 at p. 783 19 [1984] A.C. 50 at p. 72 20 Supra, n. 1 21 (1908) P.189 22 George Munro v America Cynamid [1944] K.B. 432 at p.437. 23 Beck v Value Capital [1975] 1 WLR 6. 24 Supra, n.1 25 Supra, n.2 26 Supra, n.2 27......