The Hagen

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date05 March 1908
Date05 March 1908
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
136 cases
  • Coast Lines Ltd v Hudig & Veder Chartering N.v (Brandaris, Grangefield)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 December 1971
    ...them to come to England to contest a case against them. So we must be exceedingly careful before doing so. That was pointed out long ago: The Hagen (1908) P. 189. If the Netherlands Courts were free to apply the proper law of the contract (i. e. English law), I would not be disposed to gran......
  • Chua Toh Hua and Another v Lee Cheng Giam and Another
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1949
  • Tengku Ahmad Tajudin bin Tengku Ibrahim, Re Application by
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1984
  • The Berny
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • Invalid date
    ...98E-G, 99B-D). Dicta of Pearson J. inSoci�t� G�n�rale de Paris v. Dreyfus Brothers (1885) 2(1885) 29 Ch.D. 2393; Farwell L.J. inThe Hagen [1908] P. 189, 201, C.A. and Lord Denning M.R. and Megaw L.J. in The Banco [1971] P. 137, 153, 158-159, C.A. applied. (2) That on an application for the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In Ireland: Irish Court Of Appeal Update
    • Ireland
    • Mondaq Ireland
    • 13 September 2018
    ...on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 21 December 1988 and 2007. 3 The Hagen [1908] P 189. 4 Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v OAO Tomskneft VNK [2014] IEHC 5 The Respondents intended raising the following defences, amongst others: (a) The A......
3 books & journal articles
  • Fog in the Gateway: Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 82-2, March 2019
    • 1 March 2019
    ...69 LTR 666, 667 per Lord Esher MR; Soci´et´eG´en´erale de Paris vDreyfus Brothers (1885)29 ChD 239, 242-243 per Pear son J ; The Hagen [1908] P 189; The Brabo n 52 above, 357 perLord Normand; Vitkovice n 32 above, 882 per Lord Radcliffe. On the relevance of internationalperspectives, see fu......
  • JURISDICTION ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL TORT LITIGATION: A SINGAPORE VIEW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1995, December 1995
    • 1 December 1995
    ...All ER 756. 11 Johnson v Taylor Bros [1920] AC 144. 12 The Siskina [1979] AC 210. But contra Carter (1981) 52 BYBIL 319, 320. 13 The Hagen [1908] P 189. 14 Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran, supra, note 10. 15 Seaconsar Far East Ltd, supra, note 10. Subject to choic......
  • FORUM NON CONVENIENS : ENGLISH OR AUSTRALIAN APPROACH?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1990, December 1990
    • 1 December 1990
    ...n.2 15 Supra, n.1 16 Supra, n.1 17 (1988) 62 ALJ 774 at p. 782 18 Supra, n. 17 at p. 783 19 [1984] A.C. 50 at p. 72 20 Supra, n. 1 21 (1908) P.189 22 George Munro v America Cynamid [1944] K.B. 432 at p.437. 23 Beck v Value Capital [1975] 1 WLR 6. 24 Supra, n.1 25 Supra, n.2 26 Supra, n.2 27......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT