The King against Eaton
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
| Judgment Date | 28 November 1787 |
| Date | 28 November 1787 |
English Reports Citation: 100 E.R. 155
IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH
The King against Eaton 1
[285] the king against eaton *. Wednesday, Nov. 28th, 1787. Upon a certiorari to remove a conviction by a justice of peace on the Deer Act (16 Geo. 3, c. 30) a return that the record is returned to the sessions, and that a copy is annexed to the writ, is sufficient. Justices ought in all cases to return convictions to the sessions, whether an appeal lies or not. Baldwin had moved to quash a return of a justice of peace to remove a conviction on the Deer Act (a); which return was that the defendant, after the conviction, having entered into a recognizance to...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
The King (Martin) v Mahony
...15 Q. B. 121. (2) 22 L. R. Ir. 500. (3) 8 T. R. 588. (1) 22 L. R. Ir. 98. (2) 22 L. R. Ir. 500. (3) 8 T. R. 588. (4) 4 App. Cas. 30. (1) 2 T. R. 285. (2) 2 E. & B., at p. (1) 22 L. R. Ir. 504. (2) Ib. 98. (3) 22 L. R. Ir. 500. (4) 28 L. R. I. 440. (1) 28 L. R. I. 440. (2) Judgments of Super......
-
De Roiste v Minister for Defence
...1957 IR 227 G V DPP 1994 1 IR 374 RSC O.84 r21(1) IN RE LORD LISTOWEL'S FISHERY AT BEALE 1875 IR 9 CL 46 REX V CLACE 6 BURR 2458 REX V EATON 2 TR 89 MAYO PRESENTMENTS 14 IR CLR 392 R V NEWBOROUGH LR 4 QB 585 8 MOD R 331 R V JUSTICES OF SURREY LR 5 QB 472 HUNT, STATE V CIRCUIT JUDGE, MIDLAN......
-
The King v Joseph Murphy
...5th ed., sect. 919, p. 344. (15) MacArthur on Courts-martial, 4th ed., vol. i, p. 268. (16) [1910] 2 I. R. 695. (17) 10 B & S. 91. (18) 2 T. R. 285. (19) Unreported. (20) [1919] 2 I. R. 79. (21) 27 St. Trials, 715. (22) Frederick Cockburn's Report of the Charge. (1867.) (23) 2 N. Ir. Jur. R......
-
The King against Joseph Jukes and Two Others
... ... This was another conviction against the same defendants (who were before the Court on a former day) (a) on the stat. 36 Geo. 3, c. 60, s. 3 and 4 (5), in the following (*) Vide Bex v. Mosley and Others, 2 Burr. 1042; Sex v. Eaton, ante, 2 vol. 89; and Bex v. Sparrow and Another, ib. 196 n.; and vide Gates qui tarn v. Knight, ante, 3 vol. 442. (a) See the preceding case. (5) By ,s. 3 no person shall mark or cause to be marked, &e. in or upon any part of any metal., button any word, &c. indicating the quality thereof, except ... ...
Get Started for Free
