The King against Hopkins and Wife
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 21 June 1806 |
| Date | 21 June 1806 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 103 E.R. 224
IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
The King against Hopkins and Wife
Discussed, R. v. Clarke; In re Race, 1857, 7 El. & Bl. 198. In re Race, 1863, 1 H. & M. 420, n. Applied, In re Ullee, 1885-86, 53 L. T. 711; 54 L. T. 286. Discussed, Barnado v. M'Hugh [1891], A. C. 397.
[579] the king against hopkins and wife. Saturday, June 21st, 1806. The Court will grant a habeas corpus to bring up the body of the bastard child, within the age of nurture, for the purpose of restoring it to the custody of the mother, from whose quiet possession it was taken at one time by fraud and afterwards by force: and this without prejudice to the question of guardianship, which belongs to the Lord Chancellor representing the King in Chancery. [Discussed, E. v. Clarice ; In re Bace, 1857, 7 El. & Bl. 198...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
-
G v an Bord Uchtála
...618. 17 Kindersley, In re [1944] I.R. 111. 18 O'Hara, In re [1900] 2 I.R. 232. 19 R. v. Gyngall [1893] 2 Q.B. 232. 20 R. v. Hopkins (1806) 7 East 579. 21 Barnardo v. McHugh [1891] A.C. 388. 22 Elliott, In re (1893) 32 L.R.Ir. 504. 23 R. v. Nash (1883) 10 Q.B.D. 454. Special Summons. The Ado......
-
Richards et Al v Hodges
...no right by law to the custody of the bastard cfcild.] Within the age of nurture he certainly has no right to the custody. 5 T. B. 278, The King v. Soper. 7 East, 579, The King v. Hopkins. 5 East, 223, The King v. Moseley, in note. [On a late occasion the mother of an illegitimate child, of......
-
State (Nicolaou) v an Bord Uchtála
...Murnaghan, Teevan and Henchy JJ. (1) [1946] I. R. 334. (2) [1901] 2. K. B. 385, at p. 389. (1) [1946] I. R. 334. (2) [1919] I. R. 361. (1) 7 East 579. (2) 10 Q. B. D. 454. (3) [1946] I. R. 334. (4) [1965] 1 Ch. D. 23. (1) [1951] I. R. 1. (2) [1946] I. R. 334. (1) [1946] I. R. 334. (1) [1954......
-
Re Connor
...(4) [1891] 2 Ch. 299. (6) [1908] 2 I. R. 346. (1) 1 Leach 500, at p. 502. (1) 10 Vesey, 52. (2) [1893] 2 Ch. D. 239. (1) 11 East, 13. (2) 7 East, 579. (3) 22 L. R. Ir. 642; 24 L. R. Ir. 59. (1) 7 E. & B., at p. (2) 10 C. D. 172. (3) 24 Ch. D., at pp. 327, 328. (4) 47 L. T. N. S. 284. (1) [1......
Get Started for Free