The King against Hopkins and Wife
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
| Judgment Date | 21 June 1806 |
| Date | 21 June 1806 |
English Reports Citation: 103 E.R. 224
IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
The King against Hopkins and Wife
Discussed, R. v. Clarke; In re Race, 1857, 7 El. & Bl. 198. In re Race, 1863, 1 H. & M. 420, n. Applied, In re Ullee, 1885-86, 53 L. T. 711; 54 L. T. 286. Discussed, Barnado v. M'Hugh [1891], A. C. 397.
[579] the king against hopkins and wife. Saturday, June 21st, 1806. The Court will grant a habeas corpus to bring up the body of the bastard child, within the age of nurture, for the purpose of restoring it to the custody of the mother, from whose quiet possession it was taken at one time by fraud and afterwards by force: and this without prejudice to the question of guardianship, which belongs to the Lord Chancellor representing the King in Chancery. [Discussed, E. v. Clarice ; In re Bace, 1857, 7 El. & Bl. 198...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
G v an Bord Uchtála
...618. 17 Kindersley, In re [1944] I.R. 111. 18 O'Hara, In re [1900] 2 I.R. 232. 19 R. v. Gyngall [1893] 2 Q.B. 232. 20 R. v. Hopkins (1806) 7 East 579. 21 Barnardo v. McHugh [1891] A.C. 388. 22 Elliott, In re (1893) 32 L.R.Ir. 504. 23 R. v. Nash (1883) 10 Q.B.D. 454. Special Summons. The Ado......
-
Re Connor
...(4) [1891] 2 Ch. 299. (6) [1908] 2 I. R. 346. (1) 1 Leach 500, at p. 502. (1) 10 Vesey, 52. (2) [1893] 2 Ch. D. 239. (1) 11 East, 13. (2) 7 East, 579. (3) 22 L. R. Ir. 642; 24 L. R. Ir. 59. (1) 7 E. & B., at p. (2) 10 C. D. 172. (3) 24 Ch. D., at pp. 327, 328. (4) 47 L. T. N. S. 284. (1) [1......
-
Re M., (an Infant)
...(4) [1893] 2 Q. B. 232. (5) [1893] 1 Ch. 143. (6) [1919] 1 I. R. 361. (7) [1933] I. R. 618. (1) [1919] 1 I. R. 361. (2) Cro. Car. 470. (3) 7 East 579. (4) [1891] A. C. 388, at p. (1) 7 Q. B. D. 264, at p. 269. (2) 1 T. L. R. 667. (3) 11 Ir. C. L. R. 298. (4) 10 Q. B. D. 454. (1) [1891] A. C......
-
RL v KJS Through Her Legal Representative
...Ors [1894] 2 QB 685; Wedd v Wedd [1948] SASR 104 — applied B v J [1996] FLC 92–716; In re C [1993] Fam 210; R v Hopkins (1806) 7 East 579; 103 ER 224; Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SMB (1992) 175 CLR 218; R v Soper (1793) 5 Term Rep 278; In the marriage o......
Get Started for Free