The King against The Warden of the Fleet
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1793 |
| Date | 01 January 1793 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 87 E.R. 223
COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMON PLEAS, EXCHEQUER.
The King against The Warden of the Fleet
3 MOD. 336. HILARY TERM, 2 WILLIAM AND MARY. IN B. R. 223 case 204. the king against the warden of the fleet. An inquisition of office, finding that the warden of the Fleet had permitted voluntary escapes, without finding what estate he had in the office, is not sufficient to entitle the King to the forfeiture.-S. C. Holt, 504. S. C. 3 Lev. 288. 39 Hen. 6, pi. 32. Salk. 469. 2 Bulst. 58. 3 Bac. Abr. 743, 744. An inquisition being found to seize the office of warden of the Fleet into the King's hands, the Court of Chancery, assisted with three Judges, was moved that it might be quashed. The...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
-
Barker v Damer
...which is local, and therefore to be brought where the land lies. S. C. 2 Salk. 651.-See also the case of Weblt v. Eusselt, 3 Term Eep. 39387 E.R. 223 COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMON PLEAS, Barker against Damer case 205. barker against damer. Hilary Term, 1 Will, and Mary, Roll 635 ......
-
The Queen against Tutchin
...5 Co. (e) Hardres, 504. (/) Cro. Jac. 211. (g) Year-Book 4 Hen. 6, pi. 18. Fitz. Abr. "Amendment," pi. 22. (h) 8 Co. 156. (i) See Rex v. Wilkes, 4 Burr, 2569, and Bex v. Holland, 4 Term Eep. 457. 6 MOD. 27J. MICHAELMAS TERM, 3 QUEEN ANNE. IN B. R. 1017 party. But he agreed, that an amendmen......
-
The King against The Mayor and Aldermen of London
...point was argued by Sir B. Shower; but the Court was unanimously of opinion that a mandamus does not lie in this case. Ante, 217, and in S. C. 3 Mod. 335. The Court are said to have been of opinion that the Arches have an original and independent jurisdiction, like all other Courts, over it......
-
Dominus R v Ballivos de Morpeth
...C.J. said a mandamus would not lie to restore a register of an Ecclesiastical 384 TRINITY TERM, 3 GEO. 1 STRANGE, 60. Court, Show. 252. 3 Mod. 335. Show. 217, 261, 251. Mandamus denied for a proctor of Doctor's Commons. And in 1 Sid. 169, for a steward of a court baron ; and in Stiles 458, ......
Get Started for Free