The King v Richard Thompson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1785 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
The King (Martin) v Mahony
...98. (1) 14 & 15 Vict. c. 93. (2) 22 L. R. Ir. 98. (3) 22 L. R. Ir., pp. 512–514. (4) 22 Q. B. D. 345. (5) 2 H. & N. 219. (1) Cald. 175. (2) 2 T. R. 18. (3) 7 T. R. (4) 8 T. R. 222. (5) 9 East, 385. (1) 22 L. R. Ir., 504, note. (2) L. R. 10 Q. B. 587. (3) 22 L. R. Ir. 500. (4) 22 L. R. Ir. 9......
-
The Queen against Tordoft
...(a) Rex v. Baker, 2 Str. 1240; Rex v. Vipmt, 2 Burr. 1163. (J)1 Rex v. Aikin, 3 Burr. 1785 ; Rex v. Kempson, 1 Cowp. 241 ; Rex v. Thompson, 2 T. R. 18; Rex v. Pearse, 9 East, 358; Rex v. Ben-well, 6 T. R. 75; note (a) to Rex v. Stone, 1 East, 648; Rex v. Lovet, 7 T. R. 152 ; Rex v. Crisp, 1......
-
Rogers against Grazebrook and Another
...and, being so seised, demised the close to Charles Berners, his executors, administrators and assigns, from 29th September 1804 to the (b) 2 T. R. 18, 23. See Rex v. Stone, 1 East, 639, 648, note (a). 1112 EOGEES V. GRAZEBROOK 8 0-B. 896. full end, &c. of ninety seven years thence next, &c.......
-
Aldridge v Haines and Seven Others
...do, it cannot be contended that these acts of the Court would, by reason of such neglect, be held invalid in an action of trespass. It (c) 2 T. R. 18. See as to this case, Rex v. Stone, 1 East, 648, n. (a). 2B.&AD.409. DAGLEY V. KENTISH 1195 is true there is no proof that the plaintiff was ......
Request a trial to view additional results