The Marpessa
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1891 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Morrison Steamship Company Ltd v Greystoke Castle (Cargo Owners)
...in the case. Before the Registrar and the President the question debated seems to have been solely whether the decision in the ( Marpessa 1891 P. 403) was correct or alternatively was so venerable that it should be followed. That decision rests on reasons as to causation. In the Marpessa t......
-
The Joannis Vatis
...8; The Winkfield, 85 L. T. Eep. 668; 9 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 259; (1902) P. 42; The Marpessa, 66 L. T. Rep. 356; 7 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 155 ; (1891) P. 403. Stephens, K.C., and Baliocb, and Saeburn, K.C., and R. F. Hayward, for non-assenting underwriters, were not called upon. Bankes, L.J.-The s......
-
The Minnetonka
...of Appeal Collins, M.R., Mathew and Cozens-Hardy, L.JJ. The Minnetonka The MarpessaDID=ASPMELR 68 L. T. Rep. 356 7 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 155 (1891) P. 403 Collision Both to blame Abandonment of voyage The Marpessa, 68 L. T. Rep. 356; 7 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 155; (1891) P. 403, considered. Judgmen......
-
The Minnetonka
...inadmissible as a head of damage in an action against the wrongdoing ship : (The Marpessa, 66 L. T. Rep. 356; 7 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 155 ; (1891) P. 403). (6) That none of the items shown in the previous reference were allowed in respect of the expenses included in the 276l. The finding on th......