The Monica S
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1967 |
| Date | 1967 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
55 cases
-
The "Fierbinti"
... ... As the learned judicial commissioner has held, and it is not in issue before us, the statutory right of action in rem, which the respondents had on the 19 ships upon the issue of the writ, was not affected by the subsequent change of ownership of the Mehedinti: see The Monica S ... The main issues in the appeal are essentially the following: (i) whether the admiralty jurisdiction in rem has been invoked against the Fierbinti, and (ii) if the answer to the first issue is in the negative, whether it could be invoked and had been invoked by the arrest of the Mehedinti ... ...
-
Lim Bok Lai v Selco (Singapore) Pte Ltd
...the benefit of such plaintiffs. Their claims are not affected by any subsequent changes of ownership: see the famous cases of The Monica S [1968] P 741 and The Helene Roth [1980] 1 QB 273. These decisions account for the usual provisions in agreements for sales of ships whereby sellers woul......
-
The "Bolbina"
...The [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 313 (refd) Longford, The (1889) 14 PD 34 (refd) Maciej Rataj, The [1992] 2 Lloyd's Rep 552 (refd) Monica S, The [1968] P 741 (folld) Pacific Bear, The [1979] HKLR 125 (refd) High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act (Cap 123, 1985 Rev Ed) s 4 (4) (consd);s 4 (3) Rules......
- Barbury (Panama) SA and Another v Cross Oceanic Navigational Services Pte Ltd; The Enfield
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
The Protection Of Seafarers' Wages In Admiralty: A Critical Analysis In The Context Of Modern Shipping
...to this cornerstone of company law to treat all single-ship company structures as ‘shams’. 301 See Part 4.1 above. 302 See The Monica S [1968] P 741, 768. An action is ‘commenced’ upon the issue of the writ in rem , or, in modern parlance, the notice of proceeding in rem . 303 D R Thomas Br......
-
IN PERSONAM LIABILITY, BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP AND THE ACTION IN REM
...person; or (b) any other ship, which, at the time when the action is brought, is beneficially owned as aforesaid.” 5 See “The Monica S”[1968] P. 741 at 749. 6 [1957] P. 179. See also “The St. Merriel”[1963] P. 247, 258; “The Moschanthy”[1971] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 37 at 42 and “The Antonis P Lemos......
-
List of cases
...The [1933] P 224Mobil Sales and Supply Corporation v The Owners of the Ship or Vessel Pacific Bear [1979] HKLR 125Monica S, The [1968] P 741Monte A, The 12 Fed 331 (1882)Morgan v the insurance Company of North America 4 US 455 (1806)Morlines Maritime Agency Ltd v Proceeds of the Sale of th......
-
The early English Admiralty Court and the conceptualisation of the maritime lien : an historical conspectus
...to 66. 266 Morris, op cit n 76, at 8; Margalioth, op cit n 24, at 63 to 66.267 (24 Vict c 101), effective 17 May 1861.268 See The Monica S [1968] P 741 at 201master of a ship shall, so far as the case permits, have the same rights, liens, and remedies for the recovery of his wages which … a......
Request a trial to view additional results