The Ophelia

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date08 May 1916
Date08 May 1916
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
63 cases
  • Buchanan Turf Supplies Pty Ltd v Premier Turf Supplies Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • NWR FM Ltd v Broadcasting Commission of Ireland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 23 June 2004
    ...S6(1) RADIO & TELEVISION ACT 1988 S6(5) O'MAHONY V TYNDALE & CORR 2002 4 IR 101 WILLIAMSON V ROVER CYCLE CO 1901 2 IR 615 THE OPHELIA 1916 2 AC 206 P & F SHARPE V DUBLIN CITY MANAGER 1989 IR 701 1989 ILRM 565 RADIO LIMERICK ONE LTD V INDEPENDENT RADIO & TELEVISION COMMISSION (IRTC) 1997 2 I......
  • Akram v Minister for Justice
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 23 June 2004
  • GE Commercial Finance Ltd v Gee
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 28 September 2005
    ...chase up, or which third parties avoided paying by "opportunism". 361 GE also rely on the often quoted statement by Sir Arthur Channell in The Ophelia [1916] 2 AC 207 at 229: "If any one by a deliberate act destroys a document which, according to what its contents may have been, would have ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Large-Scale Claims Interjurisdictional Dimensions
    • 15 June 2005
    ...No. 79 ................88, 89, 90 Terrell v. Village of University Park, 1994 WL 30960 (N.D. Ill. 1994) ........186– 87 The Ophelia, [1916] 2 A.C. 206 (P.C.).................................................................. 268 Table of Cases 497 Thomas v. Matthiessen, 232 U.S. 221, 34 S. C......
  • Table of Court and Nominated Judges' Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • 30 August 2022
    ...Monaghan v Ministry of Pensions (1947) 1 WPAR 971, 91 SJ 692 20, 121 O’Neill v Minister of Pensions (1947) 1 WPAR 839 23 Ophelia, The [1916] 2 AC 206 (PC) 142 Pillbeam v Minister of Pensions (1948) 4 WPAR 129 20, 22 Pomiechowski v Poland [2012] UKSC 20, [2012] 1 WLR 1604, [2012] 4 All ER 66......
  • Problems of Proof
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Large-Scale Claims Problems of Proof and Causation
    • 15 June 2005
    ...plaintiff because the defendant has produced the circumstances complained of: omnia praesumuntur contra spoliatorem .” 81 The Ophelia , [1916] 2 A.C. 206 (P.C.) at 229–30 [hereinafter The Ophelia ]. 82 1994 Ohio App. LEXIS 4960 (6th App. Dist. 1994) at 11. 83 Armory , supra note 51. 84 [199......
  • Adjudication
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation. Law and Practice - 2nd Edition Part II. Armed Forces Compensation
    • 30 August 2022
    ...on Medical and Scientific Aspects of the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (Ministry of Defence, December 2017), p 67. 11 The Ophelia [1916] 2 AC 206. The principle does not apply in cases where documents have been routinely destroyed (see R(IS) 11/92 ). 12 [1947] 2 All ER 372. EVIDENCE 16.8......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT