The Queen v Jason Garland

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
JudgeLord Justice Lloyd Jones
Judgment Date21 November 2016
Neutral Citation[2016] EWCA Crim 1743
Date21 November 2016
Docket NumberCase No: 2015/03035 C1

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • R v Russell Knaggs
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 7 August 2018
    ... ... 159 In R v Garland [2016] EWCA Crim 1743 at [55] the Court said that, whilst regard may be had to the question of ... ...
  • Lim Hong Liang v PP
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 4 May 2021
    ...984 (folld) PP v Wee Teong Boo [2020] 2 SLR 533 (folld) R v Anne Rita Maguire [1992] QB 936; [1992] 94 Cr App R 133 (refd) R v Garland [2017] 4 WLR 117 (refd) R v Judith Theresa Ward [1993] 1 WLR 619 (refd) R v Knaggs [2018] EWCA Crim 1863 (refd) Sulaiman bin Jumari v PP [2021] 1 SLR 557 (r......
  • Gordon Park (Deceased) v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 1 May 2020
    ...Dial and another v Trinidad and Tobago [2005] UKPC 4, Burridge [2010] EWCA Crim 2847, Mushtaq Ahmed [2010] EWCA Crim 2899, and Garland [2016] EWCA Crim 1743 (in which the authority of Stafford v DPP was re-stablished, and it was decided that the jury impact test is not determinative in a fr......
  • Adam Vohra v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 13 December 2016
    ...in McInnes v Lord Advocate [2010] UKSC 7 at [20] and [24], cited by Lloyd-Jones LJ, giving the judgment of this court in Garland [2016] EWCA Crim 1743 at paragraphs 36 and 37. In the second passage Lord Hope said this: "The question which lies at the heart of it is one of fairness. The ques......
  • Get Started for Free