The Queen v Steven David Tobin
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Judge | Lord Justice Pill |
| Judgment Date | 07 February 2003 |
| Neutral Citation | [2003] EWCA Crim 190 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 2002/05469/Y5 |
| Date | 07 February 2003 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
A v B
...1 All ER 683, CA R v T [2004] EWCA Crim 1220; [2004] 2 Cr App R 32, CA R v T [2021] EWCA Crim 318; [2021] 4 WLR 59, CA R v Tobin (Stephen) [2003] EWCA Crim 190; [2003] Crim LR 408, R v V [2006] EWCA Crim 1901, CA R v White (Andre) [2004] EWCA Crim 946; 148 SJLB 300, CA R v Winter (Robert) [......
-
M Najib & Sons Ltd v Crown Prosecution Service
...established by the decision of the House of Lords in Boddington v British Transport Police [1999] 2 AC 143 and of this court in R v Searby [2003] EWCA Crim 190; [2003] 3 CMLR 15. Those cases establish that a defendant in criminal proceedings is entitled to raise in its defence a contention ......
-
R v Mazhar Ali
... ... The President of the Queen's Bench Division ... (The Right Honourable Sir Igor Judge) ... Mr ... We have also been referred to the case of R v Tobin [2002] EWCA Crim 190 , where this Court upheld a conviction in a case ... ...
1 books & journal articles
-
The collateral evidence rule
...2014).120. Newark (1992: 176).121. Above n. 7 at 598.122. Above n. 6. See text accompanying nn. 6–7 above.123. See also RvTobin [2003] EWCA Crim 190 at [32].124. As to the latter, see Seabrooke (1999: 391) (‘Drawing the distinction is not a matter of instinct. It involves analysis.’)118 The......
