THE SECOND CONSOLIDATED TRUST, Ltd v CEYLON AMALGAMATED TEA & RUBBER ESTATES, Ltd, and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1943 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Tong Keng Meng v Inno-Pacific Holdings Ltd and Another
...form is a spoilt vote.As for the view expressed by Uthwatt J in Second Consolidated Trust v Ceylon Amalgamated Tea & Rubber Estates [1943] 2 All ER 567, cited in para 1325 of Davidson above, that was in the context of the chairman being appointed the proxy. OLIVER V DALGLEISH I was also ref......
-
Byng v London Life Association Ltd
...223. This was the approach adopted by Uthwatt J. in Second Consolidated Trust v. Ceylon and Amalgamated Tea and Rubber Estates Ltd. [1943] 2 All E.R. 567 where he held a Chairman's decision invalid on the grounds that he had failed to take into account a relevant factor. 56 I turn then to c......
-
Fu Loong Lithographer Pte Ltd v Mok Wai Hoe
...R v D'Oyly (1840) 12 Ad & E 139; 113 ER 763 (folld) Second Consolidated Trust Ltd, The v Ceylon Amalgamated Tea & Rubber Estates Ltd [1943] 2 All ER 567 (refd) Steel and the Conveyancing (Strata Titles) Act 1961, Re (1968) 88 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 467 (folld) Wishart v Henneberry (1962) 3 FLR 171......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Annual Report and Accounts and Preparing for the AGM in 2003
...the meeting as regards the matter before it ( Second Consolidated Trust Limited v Ceylon Amalgamated Tea & Rubber Estates Limited [1943] 2 All ER 567). So where the chairman has been appointed a proxy for members and is aware that, if a poll were called, the result might be different to......
1 books & journal articles
-
Duties of the Company Chairman
...(looseleaf, 1995- ) at 28.7-28.8.17 In The Second Consolidated Trust Ltd v Ceylon Amalgamated Tea & Rubber Estates Ltd & Others [1943] 2 All ER 567 (ChD) the Court confi rmed at 569 that the chairman’s discretion to demand a poll is not unlimited, but may only be exercised if he or she fi......