The Statue of Liberty

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1968
Date1968
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 cases
  • Tenaga Nasional Berhad v Api-Api Aquaculture Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2015
  • DPP v Murphy
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 21 January 2005
    ...People (DPP) v Ferris (Unrep, CCA, 10/6/2002) applied - Whether telephone records admissible as real evidence - The Statue of Liberty [1968] 1 WLR 739; R v Wood (1982)76 Cr App R 23; Castle v Cross [1984] 1 WLR 1372; R v Spiby (1990) 91 Cr App R 186; R v Governor of Brixton Prison, exp Levi......
  • R v Spiby
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 12 March 1990
  • DPP v Brian Meehan
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 24 July 2006
    ...v MCCANN UNREP CARNEY 31.7.1996 (TRANSCRIPT UNAVAILABLE) DPP v MURPHY 2005 2 IR 125 SAPPORO MARU (OWNERS) v STATUE OF LIBERTY (OWNERS) 1968 1 WLR 739 1968 2 ALL ER 195 R v WOOD 1982 76 CAR 23 R v SOUBT 91 CAR 186 R v COCHRANE 1993 CLR 48 R v COVENTRY JUSTICES EX PARTE BULLARD & ANOR 1992 95......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Criminal Evidence and Computer Technology
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Cyber Crime - Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2019
    ...and report on. Similar reasoning was demonstrated in the civil case of Owners of The Sapporo Maru v Owners of The Statue of Liberty [1968] 1 WLR 739. In that case, two ships had collided on the river Thames. The plaintiffs had sought to adduce evidence from an on-shore radar device which mo......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Cyber Crime - Law and Practice Contents
    • 29 August 2019
    ...EWHC 438 (Admin), [2008] 1 WLR 2847, [2008] ACD 46, [2008] All ER (D) 119 (Feb) 194 Sapporo Maru (Owners) v Statue of Liberty (Owners) [1968] 1 WLR 739, [1968] 2 All ER 195, [1971] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 277 235, 237 Scott (otherwise Morgan) v Scott [1913] AC 417, 82 LJP 74, 109 LT 1, HL 204 Shepher......
  • Downloads, Logs and Captures: Evidence from Cyberspace
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Crime No. 5-2, April 1997
    • 1 April 1997
    ...Castle ν Cross [1985] 1 All ER 87, [1984] 1 WLR 1327, McKeown ν DPP (1995) Crim LR 69, R ν Burke (1990) Crim LR 288, R ν Pettigrew [1968] 2 All ER 195. (2) A brief introduction to the field is provided in: Sommer, P. (1995) 'Clueless: Computer Forensics', Secure Comput-Page 148 Journal of F......
  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EVIDENCE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2021, December 2021
    • 1 December 2021
    ...recognition evidence in R v Brown [2019] 1 WLR 6721; [2019] EWCA Crim 1143. 91 Sapporo Maru v Statue of Liberty; The Statue of Liberty [1968] 1 WLR 739; [1968] 2 All ER 195 (admitting as real evidence radar set recordings of nautical traffic). 92 See, eg, Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT