The Tesaba
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1981 |
| Year | 1981 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Alexander G Tsavliris & Sons Maritime Co v Keppel Corp Ltd
... ... Act where the jurisdiction of the court is confined to A claim refers to a claim for a salvage reward: it does not refer to a claim (see at p 400) in the same way as a claim as in .How then should the words ` in the nature of salvage` in s 3(1)(i) of the Act be interpreted? Sheen J in The Tesaba interpreted these words in the pari materia para of the United Kingdom Supreme Court Act 1981 by reference to the Convention Relating to the Arrest of Seagoing Ships, signed at Brussels on 10 May 1952 to mean a claim ` arising out of salvage `, since those were the equivalent words of the ... ...
-
Gatoil International Inc. v Arkwright-Boston Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company
...[1976] 1 W.L.R. 430, an agreement for salvage services was held to be within paragraph ( h) as involving the use of a salvage vessel, in The Tesaba [1982]1 Lloyd's Rep. 397, a claim on a salvage agreement for damages for breach of an undertaking to obtain security from cargo owners was held......
- The Catur Samudra
-
The “Catur Samudra”
...2 Lloyd's Rep 63 (refd) Span Terza, The [1982] 1 Lloyd's Rep 225 (refd) Stella Nova, The [1981] Com L R 200 (refd) Tesaba, The [1982] 1 Lloyd's Rep 397 (refd) Win Line (UK) Ltd v Masterpart (Singapore) Pte Ltd [1999] 2 SLR (R) 24; [2000] 2 SLR 98 (refd) Zeus, The (1888) 13 PD 188 (refd) Hig......
1 books & journal articles
-
CLAIMS FALLING WITHIN SECTION 3(1)(H) OF THE HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACT AND THE RIGHT OF ARREST
...Jurisdiction) Act”[1990] 3 MLJ xli. 6 [1985] AC 255. 7 [1985] 1 AC 255 at 270. 8 See The Sandrina[1985] 1 AC 255 and The Tesaba[1982] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 397. 9 [1985] 1 AC 255 at 270H and 271A. 10 4 & 5 Eliz 2, c 46. This was the statutory provision considered in The Sandrina as it was an appeal......