The Zamora
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 07 April 1916 |
| Date | 07 April 1916 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
98 cases
-
Burmah Oil Company (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate
...what is taken for the general good should be paid for by the general community" 32(p. 606). 33Finally there is the dictum of Lord Parker in The Zamora [1916] 2 A.C. 77: "The municipal law of this country does not give compensation to a subject whose lands or goods are requisitioned by the ......
- Re Westerling
-
Pankina v Secretary of State for the Home Department
......It is they who are now constitutionally forbidden to make law except with the express authority of Parliament: hence their need for statutory power to make delegated legislation. As Lord Parker of Waddington said in The Zamora [1916] AC 77 , 90: “The idea that the King in Council, or indeed any branch of the Executive, has power to prescribe or alter the law to be administered by the Courts of law in this country is out of harmony with the principles of our Constitution.” . . 20 ......
-
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service
...to produce evidence that the decision was in fact based on grounds of national security. Authority for both these points is found in The Zamora [1916] 2 A.C. 77. The former point is dealt with in the well known passage from the advice of the Judicial Committee delivered by Lord Parker of W......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
Law and war: individual rights, executive authority, and judicial power in England during World War I.
...to Requisition British Ships in a National Emergency, 35 L.Q. REV. 12 (1919); RUBIN, supra note 359, at 141-42; see also The Zamora, [1916] 2 A.C. 77 (P.C.) (suggesting in dicta that requisitioning did not give rise to a right of compensation); The Sarpen, [1916-17] All E.R. 1132 (C.A.) (as......
-
Brexit and Parliamentary Sovereignty
...have been foreseen at the time the action was launched and was being defended.29 Case of Proclamations (1611) 12 Co Rep 74; The Zamora [1916] 2 AC 77; Attorney General vDeKeyser’s Royal Hotel Ltd [1920] AC 508 (De Keyser).30 Miller n 6 above at [70].716 C2017 The Author. The Modern Law Rev......
-
The Effect of Treaty Withdrawal on Implementing Legislation
...‘South Africa’s Failed Withdrawal From the Rome Statute’ (2017) 15(2)Journal of International Criminal Justice 361.6. See, eg, The Zamora [1916] 2 AC 77; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte FireBrigades Union [1995] 2 AC 513; Miller, above n 1; Williams v Commonwealth (......
-
The Strange Death of Prerogative in England
...P Sommerville, Cambridge University Press, 1994). 39Blackstone, above n 8, I, 235. 40Blackstone, above n 8, I, 239. 41See, eg, The Zamora [1916] 2 AC 77, 108 (Privy Council): ‘Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires.......
Request a trial to view additional results