Tho. Buckenham, enfeofee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenus
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 321
DEL COMMON-BANK
Tho. Buckenham, enfeofee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenus
III. & ,1 ui C. P. I.-I1 321 Tho. Buckenham, enfeoffee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenua del Abb. de Burg, per service de cbr al use le dit Thomas B. & ses heirs, & lea ~ _ 391 322 1 ANDERSON, 3. dits T. Tey & Aut feoffees esteant issint aeisiea al use le dit Th. B. in fee, infeoff John Joyner & Aut al use le dit T. Buck & Elizabeth son fee pur tme de vie le dit Elizabeth...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2081 cases
-
Real Estate Board v Jennifer Messado & Company
...the construction and works on the relevant land only’. iii. The prepayment contracts issue 74 This issue invites attention to section 26( 1) and (2) of the Act, which, so far as is relevant for present purposes, provides as follows: ‘26. (1) A person shall not enter into a prepayment contra......
-
Lyndel Laing and Another v Lucille Rodney and Another
...On the same date, the respondents, by way of a notice of application for court orders, also sought the following orders: ‘1. That the 1 st and 2 nd respondents [the 1 st and 2 nd defendants] be removed from the property registered at Volume 1035 and Folio 296 of the Register Book of Titles ......
-
The Hon. Gaston Browne (The Leader of the Opposition) Appellant v Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda First Respondent [1] Mr. Juno Samuel [2] Mr Nathaniel James [3] Mr Jack Kelsick [4] Mr. Anthonyson King [5] Mrs Glendina McKay [6] Mrs Paula Lee (members of the Antigua and Barbuda Electoral Commission under the provisions of The Representation of the People (Amendment) Act No 12 of 2011) Other Respondents [ECSC]
...clear, then the Court may presume that the statute was not intended to have retrospective effect. In this case, the wording of section 1( 1) and (2) of the 2011 Amendment Act does not suggest any intention of Parliament to give the Prime Minister power to give retrospective effect to his 20......
-
Kenny D. Anthony Claimant v Vaughn Lewis Defendant [ECSC]
...where the alleged defamatory publication consists partly of allegations of fact and partly of expressions of opinion. 2–C In the case of 2–A and 2–B, the defendant is required to comply with PART 69.3 of the CPR 2000. 2–D PART 69.3 of the CPR states that "A defendant … who alleges that— (a)......
Get Started for Free