Tho. Buckenham, enfeofee T. Tey, & Aut del Mannor de B. in fee tenus

Court:Court of Common Pleas
Judgment Date:01 Jan 1664
Jurisdiction:England & Wales
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3678 cases
  • Real Estate Board v Jennifer Messado & Company
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal
    • 19 July 2013
    ...the construction and works on the relevant land only’. iii. The prepayment contracts issue 74 This issue invites attention to section 26( 1) and (2) of the Act, which, so far as is relevant for present purposes, provides as follows: ‘26. (1) A person shall not enter into a prepayment contra......
  • Kenny v an Bord Pleanála (No 1)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 15 December 2000
    ...in the person of Mr McDonald, at the old hearing and also by the Planning Inspector. In addition a consideration of the List, both at Nos' 1 and 2 clearly demonstrate, directly and indirectly, that this is not so and that no protection exists under the Plan with regard to this gate lodge. 4......
  • Gerald Burns v Judge William Early and the Special Criminal Court and DPP (notice party)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 6 September 2002
    ...21 9. The applicant appeared before the second named respondent on the 18th December, 2001, and he pleaded guilty in respect of counts 1 and 2 on the indictment before the Court. The said indictment was valid in all respects. On that occasion, the applicant neither queried the return for tr......
  • Salafia v Minister for Environment, Heritage & Local Government and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 March 2006
    ...Protection, still less the identification by Dúchas of the extent of a national monument. The map is taken from an identification of zones 1 and 2 of the zone of survey of the Discovery Programme when it was initiated in 1991. That is what Zone 1 and 2 are. In my judgment this reference to ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results