Thomas Busk port Replevin envers Alexander Frencham, Company en que le Case fuit
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 325
DEL COMMON-BANK
XVII. Thomas Buck port Replevin envers Alexander Frencham, &c. en que le Case fuit que Clement Frencham seisi in fee des Tenements, &c. 36 H. 8 per son testament en eacript devisa lea dits terres a son ferame duraut sa vie, le remainder ouster a Clement Frencham le puisne & a le heirs males de son corps, & sil fortune que le dit Clement Freneham le puisne more? sans issue de sou corps, donques remainder eut ouster a Alexander Frenoham in taile, &c. Apres le dit Clement le eisne morust, &c. Clement le puisne ad issue 2 flls, le femme morust, Clement le puisne morust, les fils enter, Alexander enter sur eux & eux ouste, & son entre est loyal; car fuit a juge que Clement le puisne navera auter estate que a luy & a ses heirs males de son corps, &c. & ne...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Attorney General, ex rel Yorkshire Derwent Trust Ltd and Another v Brotherton and Others
...long-continued user and it will be convenient at the outset to set out the critical provisions which are those contained in subsections ( 1) and (8) of section 1. Section 1(1) provides: "Where a way, not being of such a character that user thereof by the public could not give rise at common......
-
Comdel Commodities Ltd v Siporex Trade S.A. (No. 2)
...defence and the application on 23 July 1986 under section 27." 23 It was common ground that at the hearing before Bingham J. between 30 April and 8 May 1986 counsel for Siporex had made it clear that they would rely on the time bar defence if Comdel instituted fresh arbitration proceedings.......
-
Mallalieu v Drummond
...the clothes were worn not only at work but also when travelling to and from work. 28 The critical findings of fact as set out in paragraphs 4 and 8 of the case are these:- "4.(c)� The rules for guidance are � normally complied with and it be would virtually be impossible for a lady barr......
-
British Oxygen Company v South West Scotland Electricity Board (No 2)
...like the pursuers, coupled with a conclusion for payment of £10,000. In the result the conclusions now insisted on are 1 ( a), 3 ( a), 5 ( a) and 8. 2 The earlier history of this case is that both defenders (Appellants) tabled pleas to the relevancy of the pursuers' (Respondents') averments......